MHB Given a quadratic in x, find the cube of x

  • Thread starter Thread starter ter27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Quadratic
AI Thread Summary
To find \( x^3 \) given \( x^2 = x + 3 \), one can first rearrange the equation to form \( x^2 - x - 3 = 0 \) and apply the quadratic formula. Once the values of \( x \) are determined, \( x^3 \) can be calculated using the relationship \( x^3 = x \cdot x^2 \). Substituting \( x^2 \) from the original equation into this expression simplifies the calculation. The final result for \( x^3 \) can be derived directly from these steps.
ter27
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
if $x^2 = x+3$ then $x^3 = ??$ Not sure about this would appreciate some help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Assuming that your question is the following:

If $x^2=x+3$, then find $x^3$

Here, we need to find what $x$ is, and to do so, we can apply the quadratic formula on $x^2-x-3=0$
 
Rido12 said:
Assuming that your question is the following:

If $x^2=x+3$, then find $x^3$

Here, we need to find what $x$ is, and to do so, we can apply the quadratic formula on $x^2-x-3=0$

Thanks a lot have got it
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top