1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Given: parallelogram and right angle; Prove: parallelogram

  1. Feb 16, 2016 #1
    kaLbypg.png

    I'm curious if it looks like I defined the reasons correctly to prove that FBCD is indeed a parallelogram. Specifically, I'm unsure if I'm using #4 "definition of coincident" and #5,6 "reflexive property" correctly in their terminology. I don't have anyone else, or any teacher to ping this back to or I would try to not waste space here. This is my finished proof:

    IWMfDfz.jpg

    I apologize about cutting the top half of the worked problem off. It should be mirrored to the unworked problem above. If it helps, I can repost the image upon request.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 16, 2016 #2

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Wasn't ##AD // BC## because ABCE is a parallelogram ?

    And isn't there a theorem stating ##\angle F = \angle D \rightarrow FB // CD ## ?
    And then you have enough to state FBCD is a parallelogram.
     
  4. Feb 17, 2016 #3
    Sorry for the late reply, just got back from school.

    Am I allowed to automatically assume that AD // BC because of the two 90° angles lying upon the line. I understand that this is true, but am I allowed to state this like:
    AD//BC : ABCE is a parallelogram

    or is there another way in which I must state this, such as:
    ∠F and ∠D are both _|_ (or maybe supplementary together?), whilst lying on the same line AE, which is stated to be parallel to BC based on the property of a parallelogram having parallel opposite sides.

    Also, finding "parallelogram converses," I see that:

    If both pairs of opposite angles of a quadrilateral are congruent, the quadrilateral is a parallelogram.

    Does this reason satisfy #4. I want to say that because both of these opposite angles are congruent to one another, and also a special case of 90°, that they form a rectangle and thus must be a parallelogram, based on the definition of a rectangle.
     
  5. Feb 17, 2016 #4

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    ABCE is a parallelogram is a given. From that you conclude ##AD//BC## so ##FD//BC##.
    To prove that FDBC is a parallelogram, you have to either prove ##FB//DC##, or, quoting
    that ##\angle B = \angle D## and ##\angle C = \angle F##.

    With the first you are done when there is
    With the second you kind of have the reverse theorem(And I am positive that one exists -- even after 50+ years):
    ##AB//CE \Rightarrow \angle BAF = \angle CED##. That can lead you to ## \angle BFD = \angle BCD## and idem ##\angle B = \angle D##
     
  6. Feb 18, 2016 #5
    I've realized that I need to do a complete reboot of proofs. I understand most of the principles and techniques discovered in geometry. However, I cannot successfully illustrate proofs and especially the reasons for which statements are valid. Thank you for your assistance. I would like to ask one final question and that is:

    What is a good resource for someone without a geometry book to learn the language and mechanics of "proofs" as utilized in geometry? So far I've been searching about for rules and etc, but if there's a comprehensive guide of any length, I would really appreciate being pointed in that direction.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted