Proving $\frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9} \rightarrow -\frac{1}{4}$ Using Epsilon-Delta

  • Thread starter Thread starter italiano91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the limit of the function \(\frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9}\) as \(x\) approaches 1, resulting in \(-\frac{1}{4}\), using the epsilon-delta definition of limits. The user successfully derives the inequality \(|x-1| < \frac{ε}{|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|}\) and seeks to express the right-hand side solely in terms of \(ε\). The correct approach involves determining the maximum values of the numerator \(x^{2}+5x+5\) and the denominator \(4(x^{3}-9)\) within the interval \(0 < x < 2\), leading to the conclusion that \(\delta=\min\left(1,\ \frac{4ε}{19}\right)\) is valid for the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly limits
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their behavior
  • Familiarity with inequalities and bounding techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn about polynomial behavior and maximum/minimum value determination
  • Explore examples of epsilon-delta proofs for various functions
  • Investigate the implications of limit proofs in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in mastering the epsilon-delta method for proving limits in real analysis.

italiano91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is to prove \frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9}\rightarrow-\frac{1}{4} as x\rightarrow1, using first principles, i.e. using an epsilon-delta proof.

I understand the method and get to this stage:

|x-1||\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}| < ε

which leads to |x-1| < \frac{ε}{|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|}

Now I need to get the right hand side in terms of ε alone without x, so I know I need to look at the boundaries of |\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}| using the assumption |x-1| < 1.

I want the RHS to be as small as possible so this will be when |\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}| is at its maximum, and this is where I'm unsure if what I've done next is correct.

Using |x-1| < 1 to get -1 < x-1 < 1 and then 0 < x < 2, and then taking the numerator x^{2}+5x+5 first, is there any problem with putting 0 and 2 respectivley into the formula to get it's min and max values?

ie is 5 < x^{2}+5x+5 < 19 (and hence) 5 < |x^{2}+5x+5| < 19 correct?

The same applies to 4(x^{3}-9), is -36 < 4(x^{3}-9) < -4 (and hence) 4 < |4(x^{3}-9)| < 36 correct?

If so I can get \frac{4ε}{19} and I can finish the proof.

thanks

ps sorry about the messy latex first time using it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
italiano91 said:
The question is to prove \frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9}\rightarrow-\frac{1}{4} as x\rightarrow1, using first principles, i.e. using an epsilon-delta proof.

I understand the method and get to this stage:

|x-1||\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}| < ε

which leads to |x-1| < \frac{ε}{|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|}

Now I need to get the right hand side in terms of ε alone without x, so I know I need to look at the boundaries of |\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}| using the assumption |x-1| < 1.

I want the RHS to be as small as possible so this will be when |\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}| is at its maximum, and this is where I'm unsure if what I've done next is correct.

Using |x-1| < 1 to get -1 < x-1 < 1 and then 0 < x < 2, and then taking the numerator x^{2}+5x+5 first, is there any problem with putting 0 and 2 respectively into the formula to get it's min and max values?

ie is 5 < x^{2}+5x+5 < 19 (and hence) 5 < |x^{2}+5x+5| < 19 correct?

The same applies to 4(x^{3}-9), is -36 < 4(x^{3}-9) < -4 (and hence) 4 < |4(x^{3}-9)| < 36 correct?

If so I can get \frac{4ε}{19} and I can finish the proof.

thanks

ps sorry about the messy latex first time using it.

The Latex looks fine.

I didn't go through all of your derivation. However, the result, \displaystyle \delta=\min\left(1,\ \frac{4ε}{19}\right) is correct, (if that's what you meant).
 
SammyS said:
The Latex looks fine.

I didn't go through all of your derivation. However, the result, \displaystyle \delta=\min\left(1,\ \frac{4ε}{19}\right) is correct, (if that's what you meant).

Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K