Proving $\frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9} \rightarrow -\frac{1}{4}$ Using Epsilon-Delta

  • Thread starter Thread starter italiano91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the limit of the function \(\frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9}\) as \(x\) approaches 1, resulting in \(-\frac{1}{4}\), using the epsilon-delta definition of limits. The user successfully derives the inequality \(|x-1| < \frac{ε}{|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|}\) and seeks to express the right-hand side solely in terms of \(ε\). The correct approach involves determining the maximum values of the numerator \(x^{2}+5x+5\) and the denominator \(4(x^{3}-9)\) within the interval \(0 < x < 2\), leading to the conclusion that \(\delta=\min\left(1,\ \frac{4ε}{19}\right)\) is valid for the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly limits
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their behavior
  • Familiarity with inequalities and bounding techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn about polynomial behavior and maximum/minimum value determination
  • Explore examples of epsilon-delta proofs for various functions
  • Investigate the implications of limit proofs in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in mastering the epsilon-delta method for proving limits in real analysis.

italiano91
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The question is to prove [itex]\frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9}[/itex][itex]\rightarrow[/itex]-[itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex] as [itex]x[/itex][itex]\rightarrow[/itex]1, using first principles, i.e. using an epsilon-delta proof.

I understand the method and get to this stage:

[itex]|x-1|[/itex]|[itex]\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|[/itex] < ε

which leads to [itex]|x-1|[/itex] < [itex]\frac{ε}{|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|}[/itex]

Now I need to get the right hand side in terms of ε alone without x, so I know I need to look at the boundaries of |[itex]\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|[/itex] using the assumption [itex]|x-1|[/itex] < 1.

I want the RHS to be as small as possible so this will be when |[itex]\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|[/itex] is at its maximum, and this is where I'm unsure if what I've done next is correct.

Using [itex]|x-1|[/itex] < 1 to get -1 < [itex]x-1[/itex] < 1 and then 0 < [itex]x[/itex] < 2, and then taking the numerator [itex]x^{2}+5x+5[/itex] first, is there any problem with putting 0 and 2 respectivley into the formula to get it's min and max values?

ie is 5 < [itex]x^{2}+5x+5[/itex] < 19 (and hence) 5 < |[itex]x^{2}+5x+5[/itex]| < 19 correct?

The same applies to [itex]4(x^{3}-9)[/itex], is -36 < [itex]4(x^{3}-9)[/itex] < -4 (and hence) 4 < |[itex]4(x^{3}-9)[/itex]| < 36 correct?

If so I can get [itex]\frac{4ε}{19}[/itex] and I can finish the proof.

thanks

ps sorry about the messy latex first time using it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
italiano91 said:
The question is to prove [itex]\frac{x^{2}+1}{x^{3}-9}[/itex][itex]\rightarrow[/itex]-[itex]\frac{1}{4}[/itex] as [itex]x[/itex][itex]\rightarrow[/itex]1, using first principles, i.e. using an epsilon-delta proof.

I understand the method and get to this stage:

[itex]|x-1|[/itex][itex]|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|[/itex] < ε

which leads to [itex]|x-1|[/itex] < [itex]\frac{ε}{|\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|}[/itex]

Now I need to get the right hand side in terms of ε alone without x, so I know I need to look at the boundaries of |[itex]\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|[/itex] using the assumption [itex]|x-1|[/itex] < 1.

I want the RHS to be as small as possible so this will be when |[itex]\frac{x^{2}+5x+5}{4(x^{3}-9)}|[/itex] is at its maximum, and this is where I'm unsure if what I've done next is correct.

Using [itex]|x-1|[/itex] < 1 to get -1 < [itex]x-1[/itex] < 1 and then 0 < [itex]x[/itex] < 2, and then taking the numerator [itex]x^{2}+5x+5[/itex] first, is there any problem with putting 0 and 2 respectively into the formula to get it's min and max values?

ie is 5 < [itex]x^{2}+5x+5[/itex] < 19 (and hence) 5 < |[itex]x^{2}+5x+5[/itex]| < 19 correct?

The same applies to [itex]4(x^{3}-9)[/itex], is -36 < [itex]4(x^{3}-9)[/itex] < -4 (and hence) 4 < |[itex]4(x^{3}-9)[/itex]| < 36 correct?

If so I can get [itex]\frac{4ε}{19}[/itex] and I can finish the proof.

thanks

ps sorry about the messy latex first time using it.

The Latex looks fine.

I didn't go through all of your derivation. However, the result, [itex]\displaystyle \delta=\min\left(1,\ \frac{4ε}{19}\right)[/itex] is correct, (if that's what you meant).
 
SammyS said:
The Latex looks fine.

I didn't go through all of your derivation. However, the result, [itex]\displaystyle \delta=\min\left(1,\ \frac{4ε}{19}\right)[/itex] is correct, (if that's what you meant).

Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K