Given this formula, is this formula true by symmetry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Symmetry
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of the formula involving commutators in quantum mechanics, specifically whether the relation \(\left[ {f(p),x} \right] = {\bf{i}}\hbar \frac{{df}}{{dp}}\) holds true by symmetry. The participants clarify that while \(x\) and \(p\) are symbols, they represent operators with specific meanings in quantum mechanics, which affects the outcome of their commutation. The calculations confirm that \(\left[f(p),x\right] = 0\), indicating that the operators do not commute, thus reinforcing the significance of their meanings rather than mere symmetry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operator theory
  • Familiarity with commutators and their properties
  • Knowledge of differential calculus as applied in quantum contexts
  • Experience with mathematical notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of non-commuting operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of operators in quantum state transformations
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of commutation relations
  • Investigate the significance of symmetry in quantum theories
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists specializing in quantum theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum operators and their implications.

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I know that,
\left[ {f(x),p} \right] = {\bf{i}}\hbar \frac{{df}}{{dx}}

By symmetry, is it also true that,
\left[ {f(p),x} \right] = {\bf{i}}\hbar \frac{{df}}{{dp}}

...since x and p are just symbols?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. These are commutators, and the symbols aren't just placeholders, they actually mean something. Almost everything in quantum mechanics has a meaning that can change based on how you associate that meaning to something else. That is why operators that commute have such a high importance, the overall meaning of what you are doing doesn't change between the two operators that commute.

[f(x),p]g=-i*h*\frac{d}{dx}(f*g)+ihf*dg/dx = -ih(gdf/dx+fdg/dx-fdg/dx)= ihgdf/dx

The g's go away and you get your answer. (btw, the stars aren't convolutions, just multiplication)

So then work out the next one in a jiffy.

[f(p),x]g=f*x*g-g*f*x=0
 
Well... according to my calculations, it is true that
\left[f(p),x\right] = i\hbar\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}p}
but not just because of symmetry. I'll second what Mindscrape wrote about the symbols not being just placeholders; they do have particular meanings.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K