Godiva dark chocolate is the best

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the superiority of Godiva dark chocolate compared to other brands, particularly Ghirardelli and Hershey's. Participants unanimously agree that Godiva offers a rich flavor profile that stands out, especially their dark chocolate with mint. While some members express a dislike for overly sweet chocolates, they appreciate the intensity of dark chocolate, with preferences varying from 60% to 86% cacao. The consensus is that Godiva remains the top choice for quality dark chocolate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chocolate cacao percentages (e.g., 60% vs. 86% cacao)
  • Familiarity with different chocolate brands (e.g., Godiva, Ghirardelli, Hershey's)
  • Knowledge of flavor profiles in dark chocolate (e.g., bitterness, richness, fruit notes)
  • Awareness of chocolate temperature effects on taste
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the flavor profiles of various chocolate brands, focusing on Godiva and Ghirardelli.
  • Explore the health benefits and drawbacks of different cacao percentages in chocolate.
  • Learn about the impact of temperature on chocolate tasting experiences.
  • Investigate homemade chocolate recipes to customize sweetness and flavor.
USEFUL FOR

Chocolate enthusiasts, confectionery professionals, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of dark chocolate quality and flavor distinctions.

  • #31


Oh, so that's what you call those things. I eat them raw all the time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


Moonbear said:
I really need to find a drooling smiley!

How 'bout this one?
tsg_smiley_drool.gif
Google is an amazing thing. You can find anything in seconds.
 
  • #33


or how about this one?
4_15_1.gif
It's jubilant!
 
  • #34


Apparently a pool of saliva makes a good trampoline.
 
  • #35


Proton Soup said:
ah, is that the trick? that should make for an interesting experiment. the shells on the filberts are much thicker than on chestnuts. do you crack them all first? or just let the steam do it? :devil:
If you want to toast hazelnuts, you would do it after they are shelled, just like you would toast almonds.

I eat hazelnuts just as they are from the shell.

Also, fliberts are not hazelnuts, but are closely related.

Common hazel is typically a shrub reaching 3-8 m tall, but can reach 15 m. The leaves are deciduous, rounded, 6-12 cm long and across, softly hairy on both surfaces, and with a double-serrate margin. The flowers are produced very early in spring, before the leaves, and are monoecious with single-sex wind-pollinated catkins. Male catkins are pale yellow and 5-12 cm long, while female catkins are very small and largely concealed in the buds with only the bright red 1-3 mm long styles visible. The fruit is a nut, produced in clusters of one to five together, each nut held in a short leafy involucre ('husk') which encloses about three quarters of the nut. The nut is roughly spherical to oval, 15-20 mm long and 12-20 mm broad (larger, up to 25 mm long, in some cultivated selections), yellow-brown with a pale scar at the base. The nut falls out of the involucre when ripe, about 7-8 months after pollination.[1][3][4]

It is readily distinguished from the closely related Filbert (Corylus maxima) by the short involucre; in the Filbert the nut is fully enclosed by a beak-like involucre longer than the nut.[1]

Hazelnut

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corylus_avellana

Filbert

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corylus_maxima
 
Last edited:
  • #36


Proton Soup said:
ah, is that the trick? that should make for an interesting experiment. the shells on the filberts are much thicker than on chestnuts. do you crack them all first? or just let the steam do it? :devil:
Take them out of the shells first! :bugeye:

physics girl phd said:
How 'bout this one?
tsg_smiley_drool.gif
Google is an amazing thing. You can find anything in seconds.

Looks more like it's wetting itself. I think I have at least a few more years to go before I need that one. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
911
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K