Going from polar coor. to cartesian coor.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marioqwe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting polar coordinates back to Cartesian coordinates, specifically addressing the challenge of determining the correct angle when both coordinates are negative. It is established that when both a and b are negative, the point lies in the third quadrant, necessitating the addition of π to the angle derived from atan(b/a) to obtain the correct θ. The use of the atan2 function is recommended, as it accounts for the quadrant and avoids issues like division by zero. The conversation clarifies that while atan is typically limited to a range of (-π/2, π/2), atan2 provides a broader range of (-π, π), ensuring a unique angle for each point. This approach simplifies the conversion process and enhances accuracy in coordinate transformations.
Marioqwe
Messages
65
Reaction score
4
Hello, I recently run into a problem. Let's say I have the point (a,b) and (-a,-b). The, I know that θ_1 = atan(b/a) and θ_2 = atan((-b)/(-a)) = θ_1.

But, what if I want to go back to Cartesian coordinates? If I assume r = 1,
a = cos(θ_1) and b = sin(θ_1) while
-a = cos(θ_2) and b = sin(θ_2).

I am sure this is very simple and it has to do with the fact that the range of atan is (-π/2,π/2). But is there a way of getting back the -a? Could I just add π to the angle whenever a and b are negatives?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Atan is multivalued, so you need to use more information to get the angle.
 
Marioqwe said:
Hello, I recently run into a problem. Let's say I have the point (a,b) and (-a,-b). The, I know that θ_1 = atan(b/a) and θ_2 = atan((-b)/(-a)) = θ_1.

But, what if I want to go back to Cartesian coordinates? If I assume r = 1,
a = cos(θ_1) and b = sin(θ_1) while
-a = cos(θ_2) and b = sin(θ_2).

I am sure this is very simple and it has to do with the fact that the range of atan is (-π/2,π/2). But is there a way of getting back the -a? Could I just add π to the angle whenever a and b are negatives?

In a word, yes. If a and b are both negative, then the point is in the third quadrant and you would need to add ∏ to atan(b/a) to derive θ_2. [Alternately you could decide to use a non-canonical polar representation with a negative value for r].

And yes, ignoring your sign omission, -a = cos(θ_2) and -b = sin(θ_2).

Some math libraries have a two-argument "atan2" function that figures the quadrants out for you so that the range of the atan2 is the full -∏ (exclusive) to +∏ (inclusive). This function also avoids the divide by zero problem for points on the y axis.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atan2
 
I can certainly use atan2. Thank you.
 
Matt Benesi said:
atan isn't multivalued- usually the format is: atan(y/x);

atan2 is multivalued... (wikipedia link to definition of atan2 in terms of extension of atan function)

Multivalued means there is more than one value for the given argument. Atan, like asin and acos are multivalued. Atan2 is also multivalued, but as long as you stay within an interval of 2π you will get a unique answer. For atan the interval is π, so you need to know the sign of y or x to get the right value.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top