Good Books on Groups for Algebra Learners: A Book of Abstract Algebra

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Groups
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for books on groups within the context of algebra learning. Participants share their opinions on various texts, focusing on their accessibility, content, and pedagogical style.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests "A Book of Abstract Algebra" by Charles R. Pinter as a good introductory text, noting its self-contained nature and engaging writing style.
  • Another participant agrees with the recommendation of Pinter's book, emphasizing the importance of completing exercises to uncover key results.
  • A different participant recommends "Groups and Symmetry" by Armstrong, highlighting its geometrical approach and suggesting it be paired with another standard text for a more comprehensive understanding.
  • One participant mentions "Visual Group Theory" by Carter as a supplementary resource, appreciating its unique presentation of material.
  • Another participant points out the availability of free resources, specifically mentioning notes for a math course, while also recommending Michael Artin's "Algebra" as a more advanced option.
  • Fraleigh's book is described as very basic, with one participant expressing that it might not be suitable for math majors but could be appropriate for others, noting its inclusion of answers in the back.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the suitability of various books, with some favoring Pinter and Fraleigh for their accessibility, while others suggest different texts based on their own experiences. No consensus is reached on a single recommended book.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate that the appropriateness of certain texts may depend on the reader's background and goals, suggesting that different levels of complexity and pedagogical styles are present in the recommended books.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
Does anyone know of a good book to read about groups for algebra? I've head that a good book was "A Book of Abstract Algebra" by Charles R. Pinter. And I am just learning about groups so it should be basic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You probably have the Pinter-book from me :biggrin: But yes, I can recommend it very much. The book is basic in the sense that it's completely self-contained. It's quite an easy book, but it eventually manages to get into Galois theory!
The thing I like about the Pinter book is that it reads like a novel. It's like the author is talking with you. It's certainly not a typical math book where there is a definition-theorem-proof structure.
I do recommend making all the exercises, though. A lot of time, much of the important results are hidden in the exercises.

Another nice book is Fraleigh, but I didn't read that one yet.
 
If you're looking for an introductory text, I'm a big fan of Armstrong's Groups and Symmetry. You'll want to pair it with another standard introductory text (say, Gilbert's Elements of Modern Algebra), since the presentation is highly geometrical and slightly different from what you'll see in most texts.
 
thanks for the responses.
 
Pinter is great. A superb book for very little cost.

I also enjoyed looking through this book:

Visual Group Theory by Carter
http://web.bentley.edu/empl/c/ncarter/vgt/

It takes a somewhat unusual approach and I would suggest it as a supplement to Pinter, but it contains a lot of really nice material presented in a different way to other texts.
 
well, you get what you pay for, but there is a free book, notes for math 843, on the website

http://www.math.uga.edu/~roy/Among books by experts, and for sale, I recommend Michael Artin's Algebra.
 
Fraleigh is the most basic algebra book I've seen, but don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with that if that is the appropriate book for the reader (though I would not recommend it to a maths major...). I think most people will be able to handle Fraleigh, it also has answers at the back. You don't need the latest edition, but don't get either of the first two editions because they have no proofs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K