Google's challenger, Bing it On

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Frustration with Google search results has been expressed due to the prevalence of spam and excessive multimedia content, which can clutter the search experience, particularly when searching for celebrities. Users find the overload of information, including photos and videos, to be more annoying than helpful. In contrast, Bing is noted for its improvements in search quality, suggesting it may soon compete with Google, although it still lacks popularity. Recent changes to Google's search functionality have also drawn criticism, specifically the inability to copy URLs from search results, which hinders sharing useful links. Alternatives like DuckDuckGo and Startpage are mentioned for their privacy features and less cluttered results. Overall, there is a growing sentiment that Google may be losing its edge in search quality, with users exploring other search engines.
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,728
I hate to say it but I've been frustrated with Google lately. Lots of spam in results and too much on page information. Like if I search for a celeb. I'll get photos, information, videos and etc all cramping the search results. Too much multimedia. Sometimes it is quick and useful, but mostly it's annoying.

Anyho, Bing has been getting better. It's not quite there yet, but they are finally making good progress and imo will be soon able to compete with Google results. Not in popularity yet, but in pure quality results.

Here is an interesting site to show how far Bing has come.
http://www.bingiton.com
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I do use Bing as a home page. The daily scenic pictures are fascinating.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I hate to say it but I've been frustrated with Google lately. Lots of spam in results and too much on page information. Like if I search for a celeb. I'll get photos, information, videos and etc all cramping the search results. Too much multimedia. Sometimes it is quick and useful, but mostly it's annoying.

Anyho, Bing has been getting better. It's not quite there yet, but they are finally making good progress and imo will be soon able to compete with Google results. Not in popularity yet, but in pure quality results.

Here is an interesting site to show how far Bing has come.
http://www.bingiton.com

Google has also made a change recently that I find very annoying. When you do a search and get lots of good hits, you can no longer copy the address bar and post it as a link to the search. I used to do that all the time to help PF newbies learn how to use good search terms to find useful web pages. But now when you do a search, the URL box is empty. Frustrating.
 
berkeman said:
Google has also made a change recently that I find very annoying. When you do a search and get lots of good hits, you can no longer copy the address bar and post it as a link to the search. I used to do that all the time to help PF newbies learn how to use good search terms to find useful web pages. But now when you do a search, the URL box is empty. Frustrating.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, here?

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclien...96,d.eWU&fp=7bfa033871245053&biw=1106&bih=881

http://www.google.com/search?q=Goog...a:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=rcs

OCR
 
Last edited:
I've been using DuckDuckGo for a while, and I generally like the results. I also like that it stores a lot less data about me than Google does...
 
cbasst said:
I've been using DuckDuckGo for a while, and I generally like the results. I also like that it stores a lot less data about me than Google does...

Thanks for the tip, DDG is an interesting project! The results aren't too bad, but the result page is a little harder to scan imo.
 
  • #10
I just tried the challenge again and surprisingly I choose Bing 4/5 times.
 
  • #11
I been using google way too long and am fairly convinced it is going to be run down by something newer someday. I'm just not convinced it will be bing. It has its own warts.
 
  • #12
I'm surprised you guys haven't found the newest and latest search engine; it's superior to all that have come before it, and all that will come after it.

www.dinoogle.com
 
  • #13
AnTiFreeze3 said:
I'm surprised you guys haven't found the newest and latest search engine; it's superior to all that have come before it, and all that will come after it.

www.dinoogle.com

haha if only... :D


I've been using http://www.duckduckgo.com a bit. Worth a look.
 
  • #14
AnTiFreeze3 said:
I'm surprised you guys haven't found the newest and latest search engine; it's superior to all that have come before it, and all that will come after it.

www.dinoogle.com

It's google with a jazzed up front end.
 
  • #15
These are pretty okay:

startp_logo.gif

https://www.startpage.com

Fetches results straight from the Google search engine without saving the users IP addresses or giving any personal user information to Google's servers.

ixquick.gif

https://www.ixquick.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ixquick

A metasearch engine that provides search results from over ten best search engines in full privacy.

I use Startpage.com most of the time (except for videos & pictures).


P.S: Don’t miss the Settings.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
I've always been a bit adamant about using Bing because of my early memories of it. Apparently, that's changed. Bing won four out of five with the last being a draw.

Impressive.
 
  • #17
As berkeman pointed out, here's why I quit using Google and started using Bing most of the time: http://harborsparrow.blogspot.com/2013/05/google-tracks-clicks-on-its-search.html

However, I also installed plugins in my browser to prevent Google from doing link-tracking if I do need to use it.

Disappointed in Google search lately, as per Greg.
 

Similar threads

  • Sticky
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
8K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Back
Top