Got Schooled Already: Surviving Engineering Classes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a student's experience with a heat transfer course, focusing on the challenges faced during a pop quiz and the implications of unit interpretation in engineering. Participants share their thoughts on grading practices, the role of quizzes in learning, and the attitudes of professors in engineering education.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • The student expresses frustration over a quiz where a misunderstanding of units led to a significant point deduction.
  • Some participants suggest that the quiz is a minor setback and emphasize the importance of being careful with units.
  • Others argue that the professor's strict grading may be intended to ensure students learn to avoid dangerous mistakes related to unit confusion.
  • There is a discussion about the ambiguity in unit notation and the standards for writing units in engineering contexts.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about the variability of thermal conductivity units among manufacturers, highlighting the complexity of the topic.
  • Another participant notes that pop quizzes serve as a learning tool rather than a strict assessment, encouraging reflection on mistakes to improve understanding.
  • Some comments reflect on the nature of engineering education and the expectations for students to develop a strong intuition for correct units and concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the professor's grading approach and the significance of the quiz. While some believe it is a valuable learning experience, others feel the strict grading may be excessive. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the appropriateness of the professor's methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential for confusion in unit notation and the importance of dimensional analysis, indicating that there may be underlying assumptions about the clarity of unit definitions in engineering contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineering students navigating similar challenges in their courses, educators reflecting on grading practices, and anyone interested in the nuances of unit interpretation in technical fields.

Cyrus
Messages
3,246
Reaction score
17
I got schooled already...

I had my second heat transfer discussion today and he gave us a pop quiz. Its open book/notes. When he wrote the problem, he wrote the heat transfer coefficient as [tex]W/mK[/tex]...I mistakenly took that to mean milli Kelvin. It should have been written as [tex]W/m \cdot K[/tex]...I had everything else perfect. So instead of giving me -1 or -2 off, he takes off -3 and gives me a 7/10 on the first quiz. My own damn fault for not looking up the units in the book right in front of me, but still...sheesh what a hardass!

Now I am doing the HW, what a punch in the face. This class got hard in a hurry. Now I'm feeling iffy on getting an A...hmmm...

My professor is one of those guys who flat out doesn't give a damn, he's like stone. Talk about arrogant engineer's Claus, I got one!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Cyrus, it's a minor bump in the road, a hiccup. Put aside, and just be careful with things like units. You've definitely got a chance at an A. :cool:
 
It's also possible he really does give a damn...enough to be sure you'll be a good engineer who doesn't make dangerous mistakes by confusing units.
 
IUPAP, IUPAC, and a few other "standards" orgs. still have a way to go --- even with SI --- it is considered poor form to use a lower case "m" in ambiguous circumstances (thermal conductivity) without some clarifying comment.
 
I'm more mad at myself for making such a stupid mistake when I could have looked it up in the book to make sure...:biggrin:

To his defense, he's damn good in lecture and very smart. But when you talk to him 1 on 1, he seems not to care. He's helpful if you ask him a question, but he I asked him about the quiz and he just shrugged...grrrrr...

It was only our second day of class too...
 
Last edited:
cyrusabdollahi said:
Talk about arrogant engineer's Claus, I got one!

What about arrogant physicists? At Virginia Tech, the physics students (all nine of them :smile:) tried to make a "Top Ten Reasons Why Physicists Are Better Than Engineers" T-shirt for their chapter of the Society of Physics Students. The number one reason?

Physicist : University :: Engineer : Trade School

- Warren
 
chroot said:
What about arrogant physicists? At Virginia Tech, the physics students (all nine of them :smile:) tried to make a "Top Ten Reasons Why Physicists Are Better Than Engineers" T-shirt for their chapter of the Society of Physics Students. The number one reason?

Physicist : University :: Engineer : Trade School

- Warren

:smile: :smile: !
 
Pfff one little quiz you messed up? No biggie, you can still get an A!
 
cyrusabdollahi said:
I had my second heat transfer discussion today and he gave us a pop quiz. Its open book/notes. When he wrote the problem, he wrote the heat transfer coefficient as [tex]W/mK[/tex]...I mistakenly took that to mean milli Kelvin. It should have been written as [tex]W/m \cdot K[/tex].
If this were another forum, I'd have pointed out that neither of those two units is correct for a heat transfer coefficient; the first is a unit for conductance and the second is a unit for conductivity...but this is GD, so I'll skip it.
 
  • #10
Sorry, you are right. I should have wrote 'thermal conductivity.' I was being loose with my words, and it got me in trouble.
 
  • #11
Units of Thermal Conductivity are insane. A few years back, when researching insulation for a furnace I was building. I found that there are enough variations that it seemed no 2 manufactures used the same units! Fortunately my HP28c has very flexible unit conversion capabilities, it saved my butt!

Good luck in your class Cyrus. However, I am on the side of your prof here. Did the units you used even make sense for the problem you were solving? This is a great example of why you need consistent use of dimensional analysis.
 
  • #12
I will also point out that pop quizzes rarely make or break a grade, unless you're borderline on your exam scores and then good quiz scores can bump you up. They are intended more as a teaching tool than an assessment tool. It gives you a chance to see how you're progressing and learn from your mistakes BEFORE you get to the exam that counts. If you beat yourself up a bit for missing the points on the quiz for not checking that the units made sense, then you won't make that mistake on an exam. And, if you just didn't recognize that there was a problem with the units, you should go back and re-evaluate your understanding of the material presented to make sure you know what those terms are supposed to mean so you'll recognize if the units you wind up with don't make any sense. If the prof only deducted a point for that error, you'd probably be cheering that you still got an A, despite your silly error with units. Because he deducted 3 points, you were inspired to think about it a bit harder than that.

The profs that are tough like that aren't interested in being buddies or winning popularity contests, they're interested in making sure you learn what you're paying your tuition to learn.
 
  • #13
cyrusabdollahi said:
My professor is one of those guys who flat out doesn't give a damn, he's like stone. Talk about arrogant engineer's Claus, I got one!

I'm sorry but... I would have done the same than your professor with you:smile: .

What mili kelvin? Watts per milikelvin??. As you will go on your studies you will realize that an engineer is not a source of knowledge at all, we are not proficiency or experts in science. On the other hand, after being completed your degree, you SHOULD be able to SMELL what is right and not beforehand, what sounds good and what doesn't, even if you don`t have any background in the field. Why? because we are engineers, we are so badass...:biggrin:

Definitely a milikelvin sounds too bad than denotes a lack of smell**. So work harder on that part instead of parroting the numbers!. (Just kidding).

**except if talking about low temperature physics which is not this case (I was afraid a physicist may bit me here).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K