I GPS system and general relativity

  • #101
PeterDonis said:
Actually, as you state this, it's too strong. The correct statement is that, given a spacelike hypersurface, one can always find some open neighborhood of that hypersurface in which Gaussian normal coordinates, i.e., a "synchronous coordinate chart", can be constructed. But one cannot guarantee that such coordinates will be valid for any open neighborhood, of any size whatever.
Ok, let me say the point is that, given an open patch in spacetime, it might be so much larger that timelike geodesics starting orthogonal from a spacelike hypersurface within it will intersect inside that region, though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
cianfa72 said:
the point is that, given an open patch in spacetime, it might be so much larger that timelike geodesics starting orthogonal from a spacelike hypersurface within it will intersect inside that region, though.
It doesn't have to be "so much" larger, just large enough for geodesics to intersect.

This is getting pretty far off the original topic of this thread, btw. The frames used in GPS are not examples of synchronous coordinates.
 
  • #103
cianfa72 said:
Hi, we had a thread some time ago about GPS satellite system.
One starts considering the ECI coordinate system in which the Earth's center is at rest with axes pointing towards fixed stars. One may assume it is an inertial frame in which the Earth's surface undergoes circular motion.
Do you mean this ? I would thank you for your contribution.
 
  • #104
binis said:
Do you mean this ? I would thank you for your contribution.
No, the thread I was referring to is this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Back
Top