I GR as Gauge Theory

fresh_42
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
2024 Award
Messages
20,627
Reaction score
27,766
TL;DR Summary
I found a dissertation from 1990 that attempted to model the general relativity theory as an ##SO(3)## gauge theory. What has happened to that idea?
While searching the internet for milestones in physics, mainly for those that led to the standard model, I came to ask myself why general relativity cannot be modeled by a gauge theory. Searching for "Relativitätstheorie als Eichtheorie" brought up a dissertation from 1990 titled: "Die Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie als ##SO(3)##-Eichtheorie", "The General Relativity Theory as ##SO(3)## Gauge Theory".
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0310111

The author wrote:
This work is intended to provide an answer to both the successes and the problems of the general theory of relativity. Since the successes mentioned are based entirely on the (at least approximate) validity of Einstein's equations, these equations of motion must also retain their validity in the modified theory. On the other hand, the weak points of Einstein's theory explained above must also be taken into account, which means that the Einstein equations must be given a new interpretation within the framework of the modified theory. The three basic pillars of the modified theory of gravitation are briefly presented:
  1. General Structure of the Theory
  2. Energie-Impuls der Gravitation
  3. The Vacuum

The dissertation is in German so I don't expect you to read it. On the other hand, it is now 35 years old, so my question is simple: What has happened to that idea and have there been further approaches, eventually with other gauge groups?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fresh_42 said:
I came to ask myself why general relativity cannot be modeled by a gauge theory.
It can be, in a sense, but the "gauge group" is not any compact group. See this Insights article by haushofer, which I believe gives a good discussion of the "mainstream" view among relativity physicists on this topic:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/general-relativity-gauge-theory/
 
  • Like
Likes haushofer, Ibix and fresh_42
fresh_42 said:
TL;DR Summary: I found a dissertation from 1990 that attempted to model the general relativity theory as an ##SO(3)## gauge theory. What has happened to that idea?

While searching the internet for milestones in physics, mainly for those that led to the standard model, I came to ask myself why general relativity cannot be modeled by a gauge theory. Searching for "Relativitätstheorie als Eichtheorie" brought up a dissertation from 1990 titled: "Die Allgemeine Relativitätstheorie als ##SO(3)##-Eichtheorie", "The General Relativity Theory as ##SO(3)## Gauge Theory".
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0310111

The author wrote:


The dissertation is in German so I don't expect you to read it. On the other hand, it is now 35 years old, so my question is simple: What has happened to that idea and have there been further approaches, eventually with other gauge groups?
As Peter points out, the "standard approach" (afaik) is to treat GR as the gauge theory of the Poincaré algebra (i.e. the algebra describing the full isometry group of the vacuum) and impose constraints. These constraints eliminate unwanting transformations (the local translations) directly, and indirectly by making certain gauge fields dependent on other gauge fields (the spin connection becomes a dependent field). This procedure can be extended to other algebras, like N = 1 super Poincaré, giving N = 1 supergravity, the Bargmann algebra, which gives you Newton-Cartan theory, and even a stringy version of this Bargmann algebra which leaves you with a Newton-Cartan theory for strings. Note that all these algebras have an SO(3) subalgebra. I don't know why one would only use SO(3) to obtain GR, but for that I have to read the thesis, I guess :P

If you want more details, maybe you can find them in my PhD-thesis:

https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/newton-cartan-gravity-revisited
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top