Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Gradient of a time-dependent function

  1. Jan 24, 2017 #1
    Hi!

    I am struggling with what I think is probably a fairly simple step in Landau & Lifshitz derivation of the fields from the Lienard-Wiechert potential. We have the potential in terms of a primed set of coordinates but the fields are defined in terms of derivatives with respect to unprimed coordinates; the two are related by

    $$t'+{R(t')\over{c}} = t$$

    where R is the distance from the point charge to the field point at time t' and time t is the moment of observation.

    The step that I am having trouble with is in finding an expression for the gradient of t'. Landau has:

    $$\nabla t' = -\frac{1}{c}\nabla R(t') = -\frac{1}{c} \bigg(\frac{\partial R}{\partial t'} \nabla t' + \frac{\textbf{R}}{R}\bigg)$$

    The first equality obviously follows from the equation above. The second equality is where I am stumped. I would think that it should be simply

    $$\nabla R(t') = \frac{\partial R}{\partial t'} \nabla t'$$.

    Does anyone know where that extra unit vector term comes from?

    Thanks!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 24, 2017 #2

    RUber

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    It looks to me like that came from the unprimed t in your original equation.
    ## t' = -\frac{R(t')}{c} +t##
    so
    ##\nabla t' = -\nabla \frac{R(t')}{c} +\nabla t##
    Is it reasonable to write ##\nabla t = \frac{-c}{R}\mathbf{R}##?
     
  4. Jan 24, 2017 #3
    I don't think that makes sense, since it is not consistent with the first equality:

    $$\nabla t' = -\frac{1}{c}\nabla R(t')$$.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Gradient of a time-dependent function
Loading...