Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gradient of product of wave functions

  1. Dec 14, 2013 #1
    Hi,

    Short question: If you take the inner product of two arbitrary wave functions, and then the gradient of that, the result should be zero, right? (Since the product is just a complex number.) Am I missing something?

    ∇∫dΩψ[itex]_{1}[/itex]*ψ[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 0
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 14, 2013 #2

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Sure, you get the 0 vector in R^n, but what would you use that gradient for ?
     
  4. Dec 14, 2013 #3
    I don't think this operation makes sense. The gradient is a derivative with respect to a spatial coordinate. What spatial coordinate are you differentiating with respect to? It must not be a coordinate you have already integrated over in the inner product.
     
  5. Dec 15, 2013 #4

    tom.stoer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The_Duck is right. The expression is meaningless.

    The gradient is related to the momentum operator. But the momentum operator acts on wave functions, not on scalar products i.e. not on integrals over wave functions.
     
  6. Dec 15, 2013 #5
    Thanks for the answers, but I'm sorry, I made an error in the formulation of the question. What I really meant was with the gradient inside of the integral, that is <p psi1 | psi2> in Dirac's notation. What I need is the gradient of (psi1-conjugate times psi2) to be zero for a proof I was thinking about.
     
  7. Dec 15, 2013 #6
    It's certainly not the case that ##\langle \hat p \psi_1 | \psi_2 \rangle = 0## in general. It's not hard to come up with counterexamples; try it out.
     
  8. Dec 15, 2013 #7
    Well, it turns out that I partly misformulated myself again, and was somewhat right from the beginning. I will try to make sense now, and put it in a little more context. What I want to be zero is the following expression:

    -i[itex]\hbar[/itex]∫dΩ([itex]\overline{ψ_{1}}[/itex]∇[itex]ψ_{2}[/itex]+(∇[itex]\overline{ψ_{1}}[/itex])[itex]ψ_{2}[/itex]) = -i[itex]\hbar[/itex]∫dΩ∇([itex]\overline{ψ_{1}}[/itex][itex]ψ_{2}[/itex])

    which means ∇([itex]\overline{ψ_{1}}[/itex][itex]ψ_{2}[/itex]) would have to be zero, which I figured it was since ([itex]\overline{ψ_{1}}[/itex][itex]ψ_{2}[/itex]) is a constant - the product of the probability amplitudes.
     
  9. Dec 15, 2013 #8

    tom.stoer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    No.

    ##\nabla (\bar{\psi}_1 \psi_2) \neq 0##

    in general (for arbitrary wave functions. The product of two wave functions is not a constant (only the integral over this product is a constant).

    But

    ## \int dV \, \nabla (\bar{\psi}_1 \psi_2) = \oint dS \, (\bar{\psi}_1 \psi_2) ##

    and this vanishes for physically reasonable wave functions with

    ##\lim_{r\to\infty}\psi(r)= 0##
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Gradient of product of wave functions
  1. Wave function (Replies: 4)

  2. Wave function (Replies: 5)

  3. Wave function (Replies: 5)

  4. Wave function (Replies: 2)

  5. +/- wave function (Replies: 5)

Loading...