Gradient of Vector A: What Does It Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter enricfemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Vector
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the gradient of a vector, specifically addressing the notation and implications of applying the gradient operator to a vector quantity. Participants are exploring the mathematical definitions and interpretations within the context of vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the distinction between different forms of the gradient operator as applied to vectors. There are questions regarding the interpretation of the gradient as a second-order tensor and its representation in matrix form.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the notation and implications of the gradient operator. There appears to be an ongoing exploration of the mathematical properties and definitions, with no explicit consensus reached on all points discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the correct notation and understanding of the gradient operator in relation to vector components, with some participants questioning the clarity of the original expressions used.

enricfemi
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
[tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]

when a gradient operater act on a vector,what is it stand for ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
enricfemi said:
[tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]

when a gradient operater act on a vector,what is it stand for ?

Visually, what you wrote looks like

[tex]\nabla_{\vec A}[/tex]

The title of the thread and your LaTeX suggests you meant

[tex]\nabla \vec A[/tex]

These are two different things. The first is an operator, the gradient with respect to the components of [itex]\vec A[/itex], rather than the normal gradient which is take with respect to spatial components. The second form is the gradient of a vector. It is a second-order tensor. If [tex]\vec A = \sum_k a_k \hat x_k[/tex],

[tex](\nabla \vec A)_{i,j} = \frac{\partial a_i}{\partial x_j}[/tex]

BTW, it is best not to separate things the way you did in the original post. Here is your original equation as-is:

[tex]\nabla[/tex][tex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]

Now look at how this appears when written as a single LaTeX equation:

[tex]\nabla\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
D H said:
The second form is the gradient of a vector. It is a second-order tensor. If [tex]\vec A = \sum_k a_k \hat x_k[/tex],

[tex](\nabla \vec A)_{i,j} = \frac{\partial a_i}{\partial x_j}[/tex]

Does this make a matrix using row i and column j for the entries?
 
Yes.
 
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K