Graphene and Silicene: Beyond the Hype?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cdux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    graphene
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Graphene and silicene are currently surrounded by significant hype, particularly silicene, which is often discussed due to its silicon-based structure. Concrete advancements are limited, with notable mentions of IBM's circuit development two years ago and ongoing patent disputes involving Samsung and IBM regarding graphene transistors. The integration of these materials into the semiconductor industry faces substantial challenges, primarily due to the complex manufacturing processes required, which hinder their ability to replace traditional silicon. As Intel projects a confidence level of ~10nm technology, the industry may soon reach a plateau in performance improvements, necessitating exploration of alternative materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor manufacturing processes
  • Familiarity with graphene and silicene properties
  • Knowledge of current semiconductor technologies, particularly silicon-based
  • Awareness of patent laws and disputes in technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest advancements in graphene transistor technology
  • Explore the manufacturing challenges of silicene integration into circuits
  • Investigate the implications of Intel's ~10nm technology on future semiconductor development
  • Study the economic impact of transitioning from silicon to alternative materials in electronics
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and industry professionals involved in semiconductor technology, materials science, and electronics development will benefit from this discussion.

cdux
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
A lot of hype is out there about both of them (especially the latter) and I was wondering if there is more concrete information about them other than the news IBM posted on a circuit 2 years ago and the patent war about Graphene transistors involving Samsung and IBM among others. Also, what's up with Silicene? Is it of any importance or is the hype there only because it is based on Si?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hype or not hype, the amount of money required to integrate them into semiconductor industry is huge due to the extremely difficult manufacture process. This factor alone stops them to replace traditional silicon, until silicon process can not be used with satisfactory result.
 
It sounds right, though it might not be long that might be needed and hence to need a new basis, since I've heard Intel only talks about ~10nm confidently. Adding some hype into it, it might be only next iteration of shrinking that they'll start not being able to shrink properly anymore. It already appears they need more than 5 years to make computers noticeably faster (in past decades it only took a year to double their performance).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K