Graphic Interpretation for Æ©f(x)Îx

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphic Interpretation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Graphic Interpretation for Ʃf(x)Δx

Hello!

I was trying to understand what means:
[tex]\sum_{x_0}^{x_1}f(x)\Delta x[/tex]
(when Δx = 1 and x ∈ Z, ie, a "discrete integration", topic very comun in discrete calculus).

I computed the result so:
[tex]\sum_{1}^{4}x^2\Delta x=\left [\frac{1}{3}x^3-\frac{1}{2}x^2+\frac{1}{6}x \right ]_{1}^{4}=F(4)-F(1)=14[/tex]
and I sketched the graphic:
imagem.jpg


However, the Maple computes the result as:
[tex]\sum_{1}^{4}x^2\Delta x=>\sum_{1}^{4}x^2\cdot 1=>\sum_{1}^{4}x^2=30[/tex]
Given a different result of calculated for me. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maple is calculating the sum following the conventional rules of notation for ##\sum_1^4##, i.e. the sum is 1 + 4 + 9 + 16 = 30.

In discrete calculus you are only summing 3 items, not 4. That is why you got 1 + 4 + 9 = 14.

Maybe there is an option in Maple to use discrete calculus notation, but I don't know about that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Jhenrique said:
Hello!

I was trying to understand what means:
[tex]\sum_{x_0}^{x_1}f(x)\Delta x[/tex]
(when Δx = 1 and x ∈ Z, ie, a "discrete integration", topic very comun in discrete calculus).
This is not a very good notation! It says you are summing from [itex]x_0[/itex] to [itex]x_1[/itex] but does NOT say what step you are using- what [itex]\Delt x[/itex is.<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> I computed the result so:<br /> [tex]\sum_{1}^{4}x^2\Delta x=\left [\frac{1}{3}x^3-\frac{1}{2}x^2+\frac{1}{6}x \right ]_{1}^{4}=F(4)-F(1)=14[/tex] </div> </div> </blockquote> You appear to be assuming that [itex]x_0= 1[/itex] and [itex]x_1= 4[/itex[ are the only values used- that is, that [itex]\Delta x= 4- 1= 3. But this is a <b>sum</b>, not a difference. It is [itex](1)^2(3)+ (2)^2+ 3= 3+ 12= 15[/itex].<br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> and I sketched the graphic:<br /> <div class="bbImageWrapper js-lbImage" title="imagem.jpg" data-src="https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/imagem-jpg.166287/" data-type="image" data-lb-sidebar-href="" data-lb-caption-extra-html="" data-single-image="1" > <img src="https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/imagem-jpg.166287/" data-url="" class="bbImage" data-zoom-target="1" style="" alt="imagem.jpg" title="imagem.jpg" width="112" height="180" loading="lazy" decoding="async" /> </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> That graphic shows you using [itex]\Delta x= 1[/itex], so that x takes on values of 1, 2, and 3:<br /> [itex]1^2(1)+ 2^2(1)+ 3^2(1)= 1+ 4+ 9= 14[/itex]<br /> <br /> However, the Maple computes the result as:<br /> [tex]\sum_{1}^{4}x^2\Delta x=>\sum_{1}^{4}x^2\cdot 1=>\sum_{1}^{4}x^2=30[/tex]<br /> Given a different result of calculated for me. Why?[/QUOTE]<br /> That sum would NOT approximate the integral from 1 to 4 because it includes a "rectangle" between x= 4 and x= 5: 1+ 4+ 9+ 16= 30.[/itex][/itex][/itex]