Gravitational acceleration magnitude - confused

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around gravitational acceleration at different distances from a planet's center, specifically at R/4 and 2R. It highlights confusion regarding why gravitational acceleration is the same at these two points despite their differing distances. The shell theorem is referenced as a key concept in understanding this phenomenon, emphasizing that gravitational acceleration depends on the total mass within a given radius. The conversation clarifies that while acceleration is maximum at the planet's surface and decreases towards the center, there are points outside the sphere where acceleration can match that of points inside. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating gravitational forces in varying contexts.
help6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let g be the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration at the surface of a perfectly spherical planet with mass M, radius R, and uniform density. What is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration at a distance R/4 from the center of the planet.
Relevant Equations
I figured the relevant equation would be g=(GM)/r^2
The given answer is g/4. But when I substituted R/4 into the radius, I get 16GM. Am I just using the wrong equation altogether? He also said that you also got g/4 if the distance was 2R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google "shell theorem".
 
Ibix said:
Google "shell theorem".
I'm sorry, I understand shell theorem, but I still don't get why r/4 and 2r (which is also from the center of the planet) have the same gravitational acceleration. Can you please expound?
 
If you understand the shell theorem you know how to calculate the gravitational acceleration at ##R/4## and you know how to calculate it at ##2R## (note that if you are using ##r## for a radial coordinate it is unwise to also use it for the fixed radius of your sphere - so I am using ##R## for the latter).

Why are they equal? If gravitational acceleration is a maximum at ##r=R## and goes smoothly to zero at ##r=0## and ##r\rightarrow\infty## then there has to be somewhere outside the sphere where the acceleration is equal to any given point inside.
 
Put differently, the M in your relevant equation is the total mass inside of the radius R. Outside of the planet this is always the total mass of the planet but not so inside.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top