Gravitational acceleration magnitude - confused

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around gravitational acceleration and its dependence on distance from the center of a spherical mass, specifically examining cases at distances of R/4 and 2R from the center of a planet. Participants are exploring the implications of the shell theorem in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of their calculations and the equations used to determine gravitational acceleration at different distances. There is confusion regarding why gravitational acceleration is the same at R/4 and 2R, prompting requests for further explanation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided references to the shell theorem as a potential source of clarification. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored regarding the relationship between distance and gravitational acceleration.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the use of variables in equations, particularly the distinction between radial coordinates and fixed radii. Participants are also grappling with the implications of gravitational acceleration being maximum at the surface and decreasing towards the center.

help6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let g be the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration at the surface of a perfectly spherical planet with mass M, radius R, and uniform density. What is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration at a distance R/4 from the center of the planet.
Relevant Equations
I figured the relevant equation would be g=(GM)/r^2
The given answer is g/4. But when I substituted R/4 into the radius, I get 16GM. Am I just using the wrong equation altogether? He also said that you also got g/4 if the distance was 2R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google "shell theorem".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tomy World
Ibix said:
Google "shell theorem".
I'm sorry, I understand shell theorem, but I still don't get why r/4 and 2r (which is also from the center of the planet) have the same gravitational acceleration. Can you please expound?
 
If you understand the shell theorem you know how to calculate the gravitational acceleration at ##R/4## and you know how to calculate it at ##2R## (note that if you are using ##r## for a radial coordinate it is unwise to also use it for the fixed radius of your sphere - so I am using ##R## for the latter).

Why are they equal? If gravitational acceleration is a maximum at ##r=R## and goes smoothly to zero at ##r=0## and ##r\rightarrow\infty## then there has to be somewhere outside the sphere where the acceleration is equal to any given point inside.
 
Put differently, the M in your relevant equation is the total mass inside of the radius R. Outside of the planet this is always the total mass of the planet but not so inside.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K