Why Is Gravitational Acceleration Least at the Equator and Maximum at the Poles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gravitational acceleration is least at the equator and maximum at the poles due to the Earth's rotation and its oblateness. The centrifugal force experienced at the equator, where the distance from the axis of rotation is greatest, reduces the effective gravitational acceleration. The formula for apparent gravity, ga = g - rω2cos2θ, illustrates how latitude affects gravitational force, with oblateness contributing significantly to this difference. Understanding these concepts clarifies why gravitational acceleration varies across the Earth's surface.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational acceleration and its measurement.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of centrifugal force and centripetal acceleration.
  • Basic knowledge of Earth's shape and rotation dynamics.
  • Mathematical proficiency to comprehend the formula for apparent gravity.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of Earth's oblateness on gravitational measurements.
  • Explore the relationship between centripetal acceleration and rotational motion.
  • Study the mathematical derivation of gravitational acceleration formulas.
  • Investigate how variations in gravitational acceleration affect satellite orbits.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, geophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of gravitational forces on Earth.

Milind_shyani
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hello
The gravitational acceleration at the equator is the least and at the pole is the maximum due to the rotation of the Earth on its axis.Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Earth is not precisely spherical, it is flattened at the poles because of the Earth's rotation. This is simply because of the centrifugal force, objects at the equator have the greatest distance from the axis of rotation so are 'flung outwards' more than at the poles. So at the poles you are closer to the center of the Earth and experience a greater gravitational acceleration.
 
It should be borne in mind that "g" is generally meant to mean "effective gravitational acceleration" and includes the effects of a rotating Earth (which predicts a lower g at equator than by the poles), the deviatioric correction due to the non-spherical form of the Earth, as the two main correctional effects.
 
Galileo is right - the oblateness of the Earth is the biggest factor in the difference in gravitational attraction.

However, the way the question is worded, I think it's addressing centripetal acceleration. Which point will have a larger linear velocity due to the rotation of the Earth: a point on the equator or a point on one of the poles?

Both the oblateness of the Earth and centripetal force contribute to reducing the net force, and the resulting acceleration, at the equator (with oblateness having nearly twice as much affect).
 
I never said that Galileo was wrong..
 
arildno said:
I never said that Galileo was wrong..
I did (or at least said that his answer didn't answer the question that was asked).

I didn't comment on your answer because I didn't understand it. :smile:
 
To the OP -- just think about what happens as you spin the Earth faster and faster...what force is acting on the person at the equator that is different from the person at the pole? Quiz question -- how fast to you have to spin the Earth to spit off the person at the equator?
 
Think of a girl on a merry-go-round. She will move at a larger speed when she is further away from the center, since the outer regions cover a larger distance in the same time. If the merry-go-round would spin faster and faster the girl would have to hold on for dear life or she would be flung off. She would conclude that some force is pulling her outwards from the center. This force we call the centrifugal force, it is not a real force. It results from her inertia - she wants to keep on moving in a straight line and have to hold on or press up against something in order to keep on the merry-go-round. The same happens with an object on the earth. The further it is away from the rotation axis of the Earth the larger the centrifugal force it experiences. This leads to a decrease in the weight of the object - it wants to fly off the earth. Since the weight is related to the gravitational acceleration and mass (which stays the same under all circumstances) we conclude that gravity was somehow reduced by this effect.
 
The effect of 'centrifugal' acceleration can be quanitfied by;
g_{a} = g - r\omega^2\cos^2\theta
where g_{a} is the apparent force of gravity and \theta is latitude. This assumes the Earth is spherical, but is a good approximation for a non-spherical earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K