Understanding Gravitational Acceleration at Different Depths on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deebu R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of gravitational acceleration at a depth of 64 km below the Earth's surface, using the known gravitational acceleration at the surface and the Earth's radius. Participants are exploring the relationship between depth and gravitational acceleration in the context of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for gravitational acceleration at a distance from the center of the Earth and share their attempts at calculations. Some express confusion about their results and the values used in their equations.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem, with some participants questioning the values used for gravitational acceleration and the Earth's radius. Guidance has been offered regarding the need for consistent units and the implications of using different values for gravitational acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need to convert units for consistency, as well as the potential inaccuracies in the initial values provided for gravitational acceleration and Earth's radius. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's use of a simplified value for gravitational acceleration.

Deebu R
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If we take the gravitational acceleration at the Earth's surface as 10,/s^2 and the radius of the Earth as 6400km, decrease in the value of the gravitational acceleration g at a depth of 64 km from its surface would be ...,/s^2

2. The attempt at a solution
I was never really good in physics or maths so forgive me if this sound too stupid.
I tried using acceleration due to gravity at a distence d to the center,

Gd= Go [ 1-d/R], where Go is the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of earth.
But when I did this the solution became very messed up. Thank you very much for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you could show your calculation. Your formula seems reasonable and when I substitute your values in, I get a simple answer without any complications.
 
Deebu R said:
I was never really good in physics or maths so forgive me if this sound too stupid.
I tried using acceleration due to gravity at a distence d to the center,

Gd= Go [ 1-d/R], where Go is the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of earth.
But when I did this the solution became very messed up. Thank you very much for your help.
i think your equation is good -try to understand the relation...see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth#Depth
as you move inside the Earth's surface g decreases from the surface value and is now proportional to (R-d) and then you can proceed further..
this decrease is due tl less mass being enclosed by the spherical volume of radius (R-d).
 
Merlin3189 said:
Perhaps you could show your calculation. Your formula seems reasonable and when I substitute your values in, I get a simple answer without any complications.
I got this,
Gd= 10 [1-64/6400]
Gd= 10 [99/100] = 9.9
 
Last edited:
Your G0 must be wrong, since we know it to be around 9.8 m/sec2. This is probably what you spotted originally.

Looking at the values substituted in your formula, I can't see anything which could be the mass of the earth.
You seem to have put M=6.13 x 10-4kg - a bit light for an earth!

Also I don't agree with your value for R = 6400 m. You are mixing your units. You were told R = 6400 km. You must convert everything to a consistent set of units. Here that needs to be metres to match the G constant. So R= 6.4 x 106 m

I think the gravitational constant G=6.67 x 10-11 Nm2/kg2
and Earth mass M=5.97 x 1024 kg

Of course, once you have calculated g0 your calculation for gp is ok. But you started with a bad value for g0

BUT you were told to use g0 = 10 m/sec2 so you just have to put this into your second equation and you'll get the right answer.

Well done for spotting that your Gp must be wrong with an acceleration of 10-22 m/sec2
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K