Gravitational Attraction of a Massive Particle

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities of calculating the gravitational attraction of a massive particle, such as a proton, moving at near light speed. It highlights that current physics lacks a complete quantum theory of gravity, making it difficult to define the gravitational field around single particles. College-level algebra and calculus are deemed insufficient for understanding the equations of general relativity, which require knowledge of differential geometry and tensor calculus. The conversation suggests exploring Professor Susskind's free lecture series on general relativity for deeper insights. Ultimately, while measuring a gravitational field in the traditional sense is challenging, the tidal gravitational field induced by a moving particle can be theoretically assessed.
GuyWQuestion
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what equations govern calculating the gravitation attraction of a massive particle (say a proton) traveling at near light speed? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your current level of understanding of physics and mathematics?
 
Lets go with college level Algebra, but I've taken college level Calculus, just don't remember most of it.
 
Okay. Just to be precise, we don't know how the gravitational field looks around single particles because we don't have a working quantum theory of gravity yet. We can say quite a bit about more massive objects though.

Unfortunately, college undergraduate level algebra and calculus is insufficient in order to understand the equations of GR, the matematical framework for which is differential geometry and tensor calculus. As such, giving you the equations immediately would be meaningless. I suggest you take a look at Prof. Susskind's video lecture series on GR, which is available fo free on youtube;

Here is the link to the Special Relativity lecture series:
General relativity lecture series:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because all objects are affected by gravity, we can't actually measure a "gravitational field" in the same sense that we can measure , say, an electric field. In some specialized circumstances we can work around this lack of a reference particle that would be "unaffected by gravity", but the case of a moving mass isn't one of those special circumstances.

What we could measure, in principle, is the tidal gravitational field of a moving particle - the accelerations induced in nearby test particles relative to each other. Unfortunately, the detailed presentation on it gets rather technical. It's known as the Aichelburg - Sexyl solution, and in general terms, it looks like a plane wave, similar to the electromagnetic case, which behaves in a similar manner.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K