Gravitational force of the Earth and Moon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gravitational force experienced by a 60kg person on the Moon is approximately 100N, which is equivalent to the force on a 10kg object on Earth. Despite the similar forces, objects do not float on Earth due to the higher gravitational acceleration of 9.81 m/s² compared to the Moon's 1.62 m/s². The relationship between mass, weight, and inertia is defined by the equation ma = mg, indicating that while gravitational force varies with mass, the acceleration remains constant for free-falling objects. This results in the perception of weightlessness during free fall, regardless of mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational force and acceleration concepts
  • Basic knowledge of mass and weight distinctions
  • Awareness of proper acceleration versus coordinate acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of gravitational acceleration differences on various celestial bodies
  • Study the concept of free fall and its effects on perceived weight
  • Investigate the mathematical relationship between mass, weight, and gravitational force
  • Learn about the effects of inertia in different gravitational environments
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the effects of gravity on mass and weight across different celestial bodies.

akhila_k
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
A person of mass 60kg will weigh around 100N on the moon. This is roughly equivalent to the gravitational force on a 10kg object on Earth.
Even if the forces acting on both are about the same, we don't see 10kg objects floating around on Earth whereas a man weighing 60kg can easily float on the moon. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine an evacuated room on earth, so no air in it. Now from the top of the room you drop a bowling ball and and a feather at the same moment. Which of the two objects does reach the bottom first?
 
akhila_k said:
Even if the forces acting on both are about the same, ...
How is force related to acceleration?
 
stockzahn said:
Imagine an evacuated room on earth, so no air in it. Now from the top of the room you drop a bowling ball and and a feather at the same moment. Which of the two objects does reach the bottom first?

Both reach at the same time. Ok, now I get it. Irrespective of mass, the objects on Earth would speeding toward it at a constant acceleration. And on moon this value is just 1/6th of the Earth's. Thank You.

Now then, what is the effect of Earth's gravitational force? Since the force on objects of different mass are different, something about them should be different, isn't that so?
 
Last edited:
akhila_k said:
Both reach at the same time.

So the mass/weight doesn't seem to make a difference. That's why no object is "floating" on Earth and all objects are "floating" on the moon. Now the question remains, why is that. The reason is that not only the graviational force is proportional to the mass of the object, but also its inertia. Mathematically you can express that like this:

$$ma=mg$$

, where ##m## is the mass of the object, ##g## the gravitational acceleration and ##a## the acceleration. The equation just states that the graviational (weight) force acting on the object equals the resistance of the object to change its state of movement (inertia). Independent on the mass of a certain object, the acceleration only depends on the acting graviation - therefore the higher gravitation of the Earth increases the speed of the object faster than the weaker gravitation of the moon.
 
stockzahn said:
So the mass/weight doesn't seem to make a difference. That's why no object is "floating" on Earth and all objects are "floating" on the moon. Now the question remains, why is that. The reason is that not only the graviational force is proportional to the mass of the object, but also its inertia. Mathematically you can express that like this:

$$ma=mg$$

, where ##m## is the mass of the object, ##g## the gravitational acceleration and ##a## the acceleration. The equation just states that the graviational (weight) force acting on the object equals the resistance of the object to change its state of movement (inertia). Independent on the mass of a certain object, the acceleration only depends on the acting graviation - therefore the higher gravitation of the Earth increases the speed of the object faster than the weaker gravitation of the moon.

That was much helpful. Thank You.

On Earth, objects of different masses do experience different gravitational force. But the effect we can observe, i.e. the acceleration is the same. So isn't there anyway we would 'feel the difference'?
 
akhila_k said:
On Earth, objects of different masses do experience different gravitational force.

Yes, and it is proportional to their mass.

akhila_k said:
But the effect we can observe, i.e. the acceleration is the same. So isn't there anyway we would 'feel the difference'?

Yes, in absence of any other force (e.g. drag due to air).

akhila_k said:
So isn't there anyway we would 'feel the difference'?

I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. One can feel the difference between varying accelerations, I'm pretty sure you could feel the difference between the acceleration you are experiencing on the Earth and on the moon respectively. Also the human body cannot stand too high accelerations, and one has to train to withstand them, like astronauts or (jet) pilots have to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: akhila_k
stockzahn said:
Yes, and it is proportional to their mass.
Yes, in absence of any other force (e.g. drag due to air).
I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. One can feel the difference between varying accelerations, I'm pretty sure you could feel the difference between the acceleration you are experiencing on the Earth and on the moon respectively. Also the human body cannot stand too high accelerations, and one has to train to withstand them, like astronauts or (jet) pilots have to.
What I meant was, two bodies falling freely on Earth wouldn't know that they've different masses and hence different forces acting on them, because they're experiencing the same acceleration. Isn't that so?
 
akhila_k said:
What I meant was, two bodies falling freely on Earth wouldn't know that they've different masses and hence different forces acting on them, because they're experiencing the same acceleration. Isn't that so?

That's right, they couldn't know just by observing each other, since the evolution of their velocities is identical. Still though, the heavier object experiences a larger force.
 
  • #10
stockzahn said:
That's right, they couldn't know just by observing each other, since the evolution of their velocities is identical. Still though, the heavier object experiences a larger force.
Ok. Now I get it. Thank you so much.
 
  • #12
akhila_k said:
What I meant was, two bodies falling freely on Earth wouldn't know that they've different masses and hence different forces acting on them, because they're experiencing the same acceleration. Isn't that so?
If the objects are in free fall, the acceleration that they feel is zero. They will feel as if they are weightless.

There is a term, "proper acceleration" which refers to the acceleration you can feel. The acceleration that you can see (for instance by watching the ground come up and smack you in the face) is called "coordinate acceleration".

If you are free falling on Earth, you experience 0 gees of proper acceleration while having 1 gee of downward coordinate acceleration relative to the Earth's surface.

If you are standing still on Earth, you experience 1 gee of upward proper acceleration while having 0 gees of coordinate acceleration relative to the Earth's surface. Your proper acceleration is the result of the floor pushing upward on your shoes.

If you are free falling on the moon, you experience 0 gees of proper acceleration while having 1/6 gee of downward coordinate acceleration relative to the moon's surface.

If you are standing still on the moon, you experience 1/6 gee of upward proper acceleration while having 0 gees of coordinate acceleration relative to the moon's surface. Your proper acceleration is the result of the moon's surface pushing upward on your boots.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: akhila_k and m4r35n357
  • #13
akhila_k said:
Even if the forces acting on both are about the same, we don't see 10kg objects floating around on Earth whereas a man weighing 60kg can easily float on the moon. Why?

It has already explained that this is not a matter of mass but of gravitational acceleration only. However, you can fake a similar behaviour on Earth. If you want a car look like driving on the Moon, than make a movie of it driving with f = sqrt(gEarth/gMoon) the speed and play it in slow motion.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
It's typical of human beings to take for granted the way people walk on the Moon - it was 'obvious' in retrospect. But it was certainly not predicted by Hollywood until people actually had been seen walking. There was a Film (Countdown 1967) that was released only just before the Apollo project and James Caan was shown, walking around quite 'normally', as on Earth. The credibility of that film was shot as soon as Armstrong and pals were seen doing it properly. A shame because the basic story was very good - at least as good as Capricorn One, in which, in the plot, no one actually walked on the Moon. Both story lines were basically Political. (You should watch both of them.)

That in itself is a great argument against the Moon Landing Conspiracy because Armstrong and Aldrin would have been walking as if on Earth if they weren't actually there at the time
 
  • #15
jbriggs444 said:
If the objects are in free fall, the acceleration that they feel is zero. They will feel as if they are weightless.

There is a term, "proper acceleration" which refers to the acceleration you can feel. The acceleration that you can see (for instance by watching the ground come up and smack you in the face) is called "coordinate acceleration".

Thank you. This is new information for me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K