A contradiction of the equivalence principle?

  • Level: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Paradox
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
99 replies · 8K views
here:
E3F077FB-678F-49C1-A911-7730621462A6 (3).jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Yes, you are correct.

You can convert F=ma to a=F/m.

For a given F: If m is small, then a is large. If m is large, then a is small.Looked at another way: Newton's first law says the F is equal and opposite, so
m1a1 = m2a2

And again, if m1 is smaller than m2, then a1 will have to be larger than a2
so sir i was right from the start i have tried to prove my point that different masses have different accelerations when dropped at same height
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Jeff, are you even considering the messages you are getting? You respond within seconds and we are covering the same ground over and over and over.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, russ_watters, PeterDonis and 1 other person
DaveC426913 said:
Yes, you are correct.

You can convert F=ma to a=F/m.

For a given F: If m is small, then a is large. If m is large, then a is small.Looked at another way: Newton's first law says the F is equal and opposite, so
m1a1 = m2a2

And again, if m1 is smaller than m2, then a1 will have to be larger than a2
but if this is true....
 
jeff einstein said:
disprove this i guess...
Sorry, we are now mixing up two things. I may be culpable for that.

Two different masses both being under the influence of the same gravity will have the same acceleration. (1)

But that's not the scenario you have diagrammed, above. The scenario you have diagrammed is about different masses under the influence of different gravity (i.e. each others'). (2)

1694713002286.png
 
Last edited:
jeff einstein said:
but if this is true....
jeff einstein said:
disprove this i guess...
You have been instructed by multiple people over multiple pages carefully explaining the situation. Carefully and repeatedly explaining where your original statements were wrong and also where they were almost right. With multiple corrections from multiple people carefully explaining the physics and the source of the confusion.

Then one single person gives one single confused answer after telling you that they were confused because of a mistaken crop, and immediately you just throw out everything you were taught by all of the previous people?

That shows that you are not seeking to learn, you are just seeking validation.

Thread closed. This topic has been done. Do not re-open, just re-read.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba, vanhees71, weirdoguy and 7 others
PeterDonis said:
The acceleration of both objects, however, is not the same, because it is the force divided by the mass of the object.

I know the topic is closed, and the OP has probably not done enough math yet to understand the full answer, but this is the so-called two-body problem:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-body_problem

I post it to stimulate the study of vector calculus and its applications in the future.

Way back when I studied vector calculus, this important application, interestingly, wasn't covered

Strang's calculus textbook is a good place to learn it:
https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/resources/Strang/Edited/Calculus/Calculus.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited: