Gravitational potential energy of a coupled pendulum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational potential energy of a coupled pendulum system, specifically two mathematical pendulums connected by a spring. The original poster is attempting to formulate the total energy of the system, including kinetic and potential energies, and is particularly focused on the gravitational potential energy components for both pendulums.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster suggests a formula for the gravitational potential energy of a single pendulum and seeks guidance on extending this to two pendulums. Some participants propose that the potential energy for the second pendulum can be similarly expressed.
  • There is a discussion about the correct formulation of the spring potential energy, with participants questioning the dimensions and correctness of the expressions used.
  • One participant raises a question about the placement of the spring and its implications for the energy calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is actively exploring different formulations and interpretations of the energy components involved in the system. Some participants have provided suggestions and corrections regarding the potential energy expressions, while others are clarifying assumptions about the setup. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the dimensions of the spring constant and its relation to energy, indicating a need for careful consideration of units in their calculations. The original poster has also expressed uncertainty about specific terms and their implications in the context of the problem.

bolzano95
Messages
89
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
I'm trying to solve problem a problem of complete energy of doubled pendulum (2 mathematical pendulums connected by a string).

For a kinetic energy I would get (1/2) J(w_1)ˆ2 + (1/2) J(w_2)ˆ2 and for a potential energy of a spring (1/2) k (ϕ_1-ϕ_1)
What about gravitational potential energy of pendulum 1 and pendulum 2? I get really stuck here. How can I write it?

The attempt at a solution
For a kinetic energy I would get (1/2) J(w_1)ˆ2 + (1/2) J(w_2)ˆ2
and for a potential energy of a spring (1/2) k (ϕ_1-ϕ_1)

What about gravitational potential energy of pendulum 1 and pendulum 2? I get really stuck here. How can I write it?
I have only an idea for 1pendulum and that is mgl (1-cosϕ_1). But if I have two of them... Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Bolzano, :welcome: (or: benvenuto ?)

bolzano95 said:
I have only an idea for 1pendulum and that is mgl (1-cosϕ_1)
Is good. Two of those and you're in business. ( i.e. ## mgl(1-\cos\phi_2)\ \ ## ).

Note: re-think your spring energy. The way you write it, it is zero and on top of that it has the wrong dimension.
 
Spring energy: made keyboard mistake, should be (1/2) k (ϕ_1-ϕ_2).
I saw in some textbooks it is written like (1/2) k (x_1-x_2), but if I do it as well, then the only thing (where angles are) I have to do is change the dimension of a spring constant?
Correct me, if I'm wrong.
 
Can't be. What is the dimension of k and what is the dimension of energy ?
 
Solved it! You have to take approximation l * (phi) = l’ so we get an energy for potential of a spring 1/2 * k * (phi1-phi2) *(l’)^2. And that’s it!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Not sure what l' is, but the idea ##l'\sin\phi \approx l'\phi ## sounds about right. Where is the spring sitting ? at the bottom ?
 
Yes, at the bottom. BvU, thanks for you help! Really appreciate it :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K