Gravitational redshift with time dilation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating time dilation due to gravity for a satellite positioned 50,000 km above the Earth's surface, traveling at 10,000 km/h relative to a stationary observer on Earth. Participants explore the effects of gravitational redshift and time dilation, incorporating both gravitational potential and relative motion in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in calculating time dilation from a satellite signal, having already computed frequency changes due to gravitational blueshift.
  • Another participant suggests a formula for time dilation that accounts for gravitational effects and relative motion, indicating the need for separate calculations for the ground observer and the satellite.
  • There is a discussion about the correct application of gravitational potential (U) in the calculations, with one participant asserting that mass (m) does not factor into the time dilation formula.
  • Participants debate the implications of the Earth's rotation on the ground observer's velocity, noting that it should be included in the calculations, particularly for observers at different latitudes.
  • Concerns are raised about unit consistency in the calculations, specifically the need to convert velocities to meters per second and ensure proper application of constants like the speed of light (c).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to consider both gravitational potential and relative motion in time dilation calculations. However, there are competing views on the specifics of the calculations, particularly regarding the observer's velocity and the correct application of the formulas. The discussion remains unresolved with respect to the final calculations and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the formulas used, the need for consistent units, and the effects of Earth's rotation on the calculations. There are also unresolved mathematical steps regarding the application of gravitational potential and the treatment of relative velocities.

EdisT
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello, thanks for reading this. I need help trying to find a way to calculate the time dilation due to gravity, from a satellite 50,000km above the surface of the Earth, traveling 10,000km/h relative to a stationary observer on Earth.

A signal is being sent from the satellite to the observer, the frequency of the signal is 1.7 gigahertz (1.7E9 Hz).. Now i calculated the change in frequency due to gravitational blueshift through the conservation of energy formula, but i don't know how to continue from there and turn the change in frequency to time dilation.

Any help is much appreciated! I would love to see the step by step calculations if you do decide to help, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So for the ground observer it would be:
√(1-((2GMhf/c*r)/c^2) - 10000^2/2997924582^2

where m = hf/c
 
Last edited:
U=GM/r. m never enters into it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EdisT
Ah my bad, but if the rest is correct then I would like to thank you very much!
 
DaleSpam said:
U=GM/r. m never enters into it.
one of the observers is relatively stationary, does that mean that for one of the calculations, v=0?
 
EdisT said:
one of the observers is relatively stationary, does that mean that for one of the calculations, v=0?

DaleSpam said:
Yes.

Actually, an observer who is "stationary" on Earth is not motionless for purposes of this calculation, because the Earth is rotating, and the formula DaleSpam gave is relative to a frame which is not rotating with the Earth. So the correct ##v## for the ground observer is his velocity due to the Earth's rotation (about 450 meters per second if he's on the equator, it gets smaller towards the poles and is zero at the poles).
 
EdisT said:
for the ground observer it would be:
√(1-((2GMhf/c*r)/c^2) - 10000^2/2997924582^2

As DaleSpam said, ##U = GM / r##, the other factors shouldn't be there in the first term. In the second term, first of all, this looks like the ##v## for the satellite, not the ground observer (##v## for the ground observer should be what I said in my previous post), and it's in the wrong units: in your OP, you said 10,000 km/h, but ##v## should be in meters per second since you gave ##c## in meters per second; you have to use consistent units throughout. (Also there seems to be an extra ##2## at the end of your value for ##c##, ##c## should be 299792458 meters per second.)
 
  • #10
PeterDonis said:
an observer who is "stationary" on Earth is not motionless for purposes of this calculation, because the Earth is rotating
Yes, good point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
981
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K