Gravity and Acceleration on a 50,000 km Space Elevator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jack5000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical implications of a 50,000 km space elevator constructed from carbon nanotube threads. It establishes that passengers in a lifter would experience decreasing weight until reaching approximately 35,800 km, where they would achieve weightlessness due to geosynchronous orbit conditions. Beyond this altitude, gravitational effects from Earth would still be present but significantly weaker. The maximum speed of the climber is constrained by thermal tolerance, with a reference to a climber design capable of 200 km/h, as detailed in a publication by Mill Creek Systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and their effects at varying altitudes
  • Familiarity with geosynchronous orbit principles
  • Knowledge of carbon nanotube materials and their applications in engineering
  • Basic concepts of Lagrangian points in orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the engineering challenges of carbon nanotube space elevators
  • Explore the physics of gravitational forces at high altitudes
  • Learn about the design and operation of climbers for space elevators
  • Investigate Lagrangian points and their relevance to space structures
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in advanced space infrastructure and gravitational dynamics.

jack5000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading a lot about space elevators being built from carbon nanotube thread and having lifters powered by lasers. I'm imagining it to be 50,000 long. Obviously this is fiction at the moment, but i was wondering...

if there was such a structure, what would be the effects of gravity on someone in a lifter?
At what point would the effects be felt?
As the lifter was pushed/pulled further along the ribbon, how would gravity's force change along the journey.

Also what kind of speed do you think would be reached on a 50,000 km long cable?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The passenger would weigh less and less, reaching weightlessness at the height of ~35800km(geosynchronous orbit), and then get heavier again, with the upper limit depending on the cable length.

The maximum speed of the climber would be constrained by the thermal tolerance of the climber/ribbon.
This publication:
http://www.mill-creek-systems.com/HighLift/contents.html
describes a climber going at 200km/h, but that is the cable-deployment vehicle, so perhaps the payload-carrying version could have a different, faster design.
 
Thanks the reply and for that publication, looks very interesting.

Bandersnatch said:
The passenger would weigh less and less, reaching weightlessness at the height of ~35800km(geosynchronous orbit), and then get heavier again, with the upper limit depending on the cable length.

Is the 35800km the point where Earths gravity has lost effect?

Also what if the ladder was going toward the moon? would the passenger feel the weight again as he got closer to the moon?

Would there be a Lagrangian point and would that effect?
 
jack5000 said:
Is the 35800km the point where Earths gravity has lost effect?
That point does not exist, the gravitational force from Earth is everywhere (but quite weak in large distances).
35800km is the point where the gravitational force is just enough to keep an object in an orbit with a period of 1 day (= the movement of the space elevator itself)

Also what if the ladder was going toward the moon? would the passenger feel the weight again as he got closer to the moon?
The moon needs much more time for an orbit, you cannot connect a space elevator to the moon (or extend it so far that the moon's gravity becomes important).

Lagrangian points refer to objects with the same orbital period - which would be about one month for moon, and not one day for the space elevator.
 
Doesn't the upward velocity of the elevator itself create an artificial gravity that has to be factored into these calculations?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
869
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K