Gravity's effect on velocity question

  • Thread starter Thread starter lzh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the velocity of a first aid kit dropped by a climber descending at 2.2 m/s after 2.9 seconds, with gravity's acceleration at 9.8 m/s². The initial equation used for the final velocity was incorrect due to a misunderstanding of sign conventions, as velocity can be negative when considering direction. The correct final velocity is -30.62 m/s, indicating downward motion, which aligns with the convention of defining upward as positive. Significant figures were also a point of discussion, emphasizing that answers should reflect the precision of the input data. Ultimately, the climber's downward velocity is correctly represented as negative in this context.
lzh
Messages
109
Reaction score
0
here is the problem:
"a first aid kit is dropped by a rock climber who is descending steadily at 2.2m/s"
after 2.9s, what is the velocity of the first aid kit?

the init. velocity of the kit is 2.2 like the climber, its accerlation is 9.8 which is the accerlaeration of gravity.
so:
final velocity=2.2+9.8(2.9)
which equals to 30.62
This problem really should be easy, but for some reason my web homework service tells me that the answer is wrong.
whats wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation is not quite right. Have you seen any kinematic equations before?
 
but The final velocity is equal to the initial velocity plus the acceleration multiplied by the time.
and that's what my equation is
 
yes, I would have gone for v = u + at.

I can't see yet why this isn't right. Anyone?
 
Hootenany what exactly did you mean was not quite right?
 
Sorry, my bad. I thought we were talking about distances not velocity, I didn't read the question correctly. Have you tried entering - 30.62? Does web assign specify a number of significant figures?
 
no, it accepts any answer to the 1% of the exact answer.
i tried 30.6392 which is more exact because i used 9.80665 instead of 9.8, and it was wrong
 
Still have you tried entering -30.62?
 
no, i have not. But wouldn't 30.6392 be a even closer number?
 
  • #10
i think the point is the negative sign, and it's worth a try, although the speed of the climber is given as positive.
 
  • #11
lzh said:
no, i have not. But wouldn't 30.6392 be a even closer number?
No, since your data is only accurate to two significant figures, anything beyond that is simply 'noise', i.e. meaningless. The most number of significant figures you should quote is three, i.e. one more than your input data.
 
  • #12
rsk said:
i think the point is the negative sign, and it's worth a try, although the speed of the climber is given as positive.
speed is always positive.
 
  • #13
i don't know about that...
this question has two parts. the first part is what i posted and the second part asks for how far the kit is from the climber. I got the second part right with:
-i figured out the kit's displacement to be 47.589 so that minus the displacement of the climber is my answer, 41.209.

so i used that number in the kinematics forumlas that i knew to find the final velocity, and all of them resulted in 30.6...
 
  • #14
heres the website's description:
a) Significant digits and precision
The computer carries out all calculations to at least six significant digits. Do not use "significant figures" algorithms to round off your answer. Do not round off 'intermediate' calculations. Six digits are shown in solutions.
To be scored as correct, an answer must be within 1% of the computer's answer (except for an answer of zero, which must be exact). You will be informed of any exceptions to this tolerance.
i'm using utexas's web homework page btw.
 
  • #15
If you are instructed not to round off then don't, enter the number as it is displayed on your calculator.
 
  • #16
Hootenanny said:
speed is always positive.

Oops of course.

But you know what I meant.
 
  • #17
ok, i'll try 30.62
 
  • #18
it was wrong...
 
  • #19
rsk said:
Oops of course.

But you know what I meant.
I know I was being pedantic but it is usually best to clarify.

lzh said:
it was wrong...
Have you tried -30.62 yet?
 
  • #20
yeah, it worked... why?
edit: yeah speed is positive but velocity can be neg.
but i still don't see why
 
  • #21
downwards direction taken as negative
 
  • #22
lzh said:
yeah, it worked... why?
Because it is convention to define vertically upwards at the positive direction. For example 30m/s would usually mean 30m/s upwards; -30m/s would usually mean 30m/s vertically downwards. However, the wording of the question didn't help.
 
  • #23
yeah, it was kinda confusing.
well thanks for the help guys! appreciate it!
 
Back
Top