MHB Gre.al.12 transformationof a function

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{gre.al.12}$
The graph of $y=\left|x-6\right|$
is is the standard $(x,y)$ coordinate plane.
Which of the following transformations. when applied to the graph of
$y=\left|x\right|$, in the graph of $y=\left|x-6\right|$?

a. Translation to the right 6 coordinate units
b. Translation to the left 6 coordinate units
c. Translation up 6 coordinate units
d. Translation down 6 coordinate units
e. Reflection across the line $x=6$

ok chose a. Translation to the right 6 coordinate units
since we are only talking about changes in x and the minus sign will move the graph to the right

well probably a better way to explane this:cool:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Think of $|x-6|$ as the distance (note distance is always $\ge$ zero) between $x$ and $6$ ...

$x=6 \implies |6-6| = 0$, the vertex of the transformed function $y = |x|$,hence the horizontal shift to the right.Another way to visualize the transformation is to sketch the graph of $y = x - 6$, and reflect the part of the graph below the x-axis above the x-axis ...

abs(x-6).jpg

btw, this graphing method works with any real-valued absolute value function
 
i used the abs on desmos to ck it
but i think many people transform the wrong direction by impulse
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top