sysprog1
- 22
- 28
DrJohn said:"Why can we not put just hydronium ions in pure water?"
Because you can't pick up a bucket of just one type of ion.
The forum discussion highlights a collection of humorous and insightful one-liners shared by members of the Physics Forums. Notable contributions include @vanhees71's commentary on the complexities of the third law in relativity and @russ_watters' satirical take on homeopathy, emphasizing its ineffectiveness due to the absence of active ingredients. The exchange showcases the wit and intellect of the community, with members like @phinds and @Nugatory contributing to the lighthearted yet thought-provoking dialogue. Overall, the discussion serves as a testament to the engaging and humorous nature of scientific discourse among forum members.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of humor and science. It provides insights into how scientific concepts can be communicated effectively and entertainingly within a community setting.
DrJohn said:"Why can we not put just hydronium ions in pure water?"
Because you can't pick up a bucket of just one type of ion.
Ivan Seeking said:The future ain't what it used to be.
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/12/06/future-not-used/Ivan Seeking said:The future ain't what it used to be.
Yogi Berragmax137 said:
kuruman said:And no premature gesticulation, i.e. hand-waving right at the start.![]()
Flyboy said:Personally I hate living in times where the poetry of history feels like a limerick instead of a haiku.![]()
It's a snippet from this:PhDeezNutz said:Personally I’m too uncultured to understand the joke.
Flyboy said:History may not repeat, but boy does it rhyme.
Personally I hate living in times where the poetry of history feels like a limerick instead of a haiku.![]()
DaveE said:Of course that analysis is possible. But it won't give you the correct answers.shreddinglicks said:Is it possible to break this pipe up into three straight pieces and model each piece as a beam experiencing transverse vibration?
My answer to that would always be Graham's number.russ_watters said:Context-free for a reason, but I actually love this one:
"What is 80% of infinity?"
It's both hilarious and I feel like maybe there's kind of an actual issue there. See also: "infinite space is expanding..."
pines-demon said:My answer to that would always be Graham's number.
To be fair, I had made a mistake in the maths and he was correct to point it out.russ_watters said:"What is 80% of infinity?"
It's both hilarious and I feel like maybe there's kind of an actual issue there. See also: "infinite space is expanding..."
Oh I see, you got 80% of ##\infty## wrong by how much?Ibix said:To be fair, I had made a mistake in the maths and he was correct to point it out.
I still need to revisit that whole thing, even though Dale got the same as my revised answer, because I feel like the definitions are screwy somewhere.
73%pines-demon said:Oh I see, you got 80% of ##\infty## wrong by how much?![]()
centerline said:The purpose is to make a storage rack for stacking atv/utv vehicles on, using a forklift, 3 high...
centerline said:It will be a static load, except when loading or unloading the platform.
berkeman said:Um, yeah. Have you ever driven a forklift?
In a reply to the above posts.Baluncore said:If you design it to withstand an earthquake, it might survive a tired forklift driver.
jbriggs444 said:It does not take much to rise above the level of the average slobs in the workplace.