Greatest mathematician of the 20th century

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematician
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses the question of who the greatest mathematician of the 20th century is, with participants sharing their opinions and engaging in light-hearted banter. The scope includes personal preferences, humorous takes, and some serious considerations of contributions to mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants humorously suggest the Mythbusters as contenders for the title of greatest mathematician.
  • There is a recurring sentiment that the question is silly or trivial, with some expressing confusion over the arguments being made.
  • One participant notes that determining the greatest mathematician is like comparing apples and oranges, indicating a lack of clear criteria for judgment.
  • Another participant proposes that the greatest mathematician is simply the one who receives the most votes, leading to a paradox where no choice can be made initially.
  • Some participants mention the importance of distinguishing between theory-builders and problem-solvers in the context of mathematical contributions.
  • One participant expresses admiration for Ramanujan, suggesting he could have achieved even more if he had lived longer, while another highlights Hilbert's significant impact on physics as a reason for his greatness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on who the greatest mathematician is, with multiple competing views and humorous exchanges dominating the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the criteria for greatness in mathematics, and there are references to ongoing debates in other threads that may influence opinions.

Who do you consider the best mathematician of the previous century?

  • Banach

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Connes

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Deligne

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Erdos

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • Godel

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Grothendieck

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Hausdorff

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Hilbert

    Votes: 8 32.0%
  • Kolmogorov

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Lebesgue

    Votes: 3 12.0%
  • Nash

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Noether

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Perelman

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Ramanujan

    Votes: 9 36.0%
  • Von Neumann

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • Weil

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Weyl

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Wiles

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • The Mythbusters

    Votes: 3 12.0%
  • Other/Nobody

    Votes: 3 12.0%

  • Total voters
    25
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,170
Reaction score
3,333
Inspired by the other poll on the physicists, I decided to make a poll on the best mathematician of the 20the century. Only a bit more serious...

Now, since you can only select 20 poll options, it was inevitable that some great minds were left out. I tried to include as many disciplines as possible and I tried to include some popular names.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The Mythbusters, duh. They have the most results...:rolleyes:

:smile:

Godel votes for whomever is not on your list.

Of course, this implies that mathematicians can be great...
 
I vote for whoever can definitively settle this dispute.
 
Never bring that thread up again, lest that whole mess get started anew...
 
Triple_D said:
I vote for whoever can definitively settle this dispute.

I really don't understand why people are arguing about the silly thing...
 
micromass said:
I really don't understand why people are arguing about the silly thing...

Welcome to the Internet. We hope you will enjoy your stay. Please be advised you may encounter materials that are nonsensical, offensive, or just stupid. Really stupid. Additionally, you run the risk of coming across content that is actually useful and/or intelligent. In the event this occurs, please turn off your computing device immediately and watch network television for three consecutive hours to remove this useful information. Grief counseling is available at this number: (555)-793-7319.
 
Perhaps the greatest physicist could settle the DDWFTTW thread. :smile:

Yeah, I know...I shouldn't have brought that one up either. But sometimes I just can't help myself. :devil:
 
Or the "If your so smart" thread in general physics...
 
Oh the irony
 
  • #11
I contributed a little to that thread (I think) but people keep making new threads. It won't die.
 
  • #12
I have go with Mythbusters. How many of those other posers had TV shows? ;:-)
 
  • #13
It's like apples and oranges .. I don't know how you can tell this mathematician is greater than that mathematician.

I am math illiterate and I don't watch Mythbusters so I cannot pick any!
 
  • #14
Ooh, let's send
48/2(9+3)
into the Mythbusters!
 
  • #15
micromass said:
I really don't understand why people are arguing about the silly thing...
I will attempt to explain:
Side 1 "We're right they're wrong!"
Side 2 "We're right they're wrong!"
 
  • #16
FtlIsAwesome said:
I will attempt to explain:
Side 1 "We're right they're wrong!"
Side 2 "We're right they're wrong!"

It's more like

Side 1 "These are the mathematical rules which we have worked with for centuries"
Side 2 "Screw the rules, I want implicit multiplication, whatever it means"
 
  • #17
micromass said:
It's more like

Side 1 "These are the mathematical rules which we have worked with for centuries"
Side 2 "Screw the rules, I want implicit multiplication, whatever it means"
Don't push me! :biggrin:
I'm trying to stay neutral/unknown on the subject.
 
  • #18
Mythbusters are clearly the right choice on this subject.
 
  • #19
The greatest mathematician is the one who gets the most votes.

I am voting for the greatest mathematician.

Therefore I am voting for the mathematician with the most votes.

However, to begin each mathematician has zero votes, and so I can never make a choice.

Therefore there is no greatest mathematician.

(i know that was really really weak but I'm not as clever as some of you :frown:)
 
  • #20
If we go by number of papers published, the answer is clear...
 
  • #21
jhae2.718 said:
If we go by number of papers published, the answer is clear...

I foresee a discussion about who's more important - theory-builders or problem-solvers...

I took the question as "greatest mathematician by natural ability (or talent)" and therefore voted Ramanujan. Unthinkable what he could have done if he'd stayed alive longer.

Of mathematician who actually lived to do their work, without a doubt in my mind, it's Hilbert, not least because of his impact on physics (while not actually being one).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
6K