Greatest Physicist Ever - Redux Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Izzhov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the debate of identifying the "greatest physicist" in history, with participants suggesting figures such as Archimedes, Einstein, and Feynman. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of greatness in physics, with contributors noting the absence of key figures like Faraday and Gell-Mann in the poll options. The discussion also touches on the contributions of physicists to various fields and the philosophical implications of defining "greatness" in science.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of key physicists and their contributions, such as Einstein's theory of relativity and Archimedes' principles.
  • Familiarity with the historical context of physics and its evolution over time.
  • Basic knowledge of scientific methodology and the philosophy of science.
  • Awareness of the Nobel Prize and its significance in recognizing scientific achievements.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the contributions of Archimedes and their impact on modern physics.
  • Explore the significance of Einstein's theory of relativity in contemporary scientific discourse.
  • Investigate the contributions of lesser-known physicists like Emmy Noether and their influence on theoretical physics.
  • Examine the philosophical debates surrounding the definition of "greatness" in scientific contributions.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, historians of science, and anyone interested in the contributions of notable physicists and the subjective nature of evaluating scientific greatness.

Who was the greatest physicist ever?

  • Isaac Newton

    Votes: 27 44.3%
  • Albert Einstein

    Votes: 12 19.7%
  • James Clerk Maxwell

    Votes: 7 11.5%
  • Niels Bohr

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • Werner Heisenberg

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Galileo Galilei

    Votes: 4 6.6%
  • Richard Feynman

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • Paul Dirac

    Votes: 1 1.6%
  • Erwin Schroedinger

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • Ernest Rutherford

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    61
  • #91
Schrödinger's Dog said:
:smile: OK calm down I was only teasing really anyway, you just had on that, I am an authority head, so I was prodding you for giggles.

How dare you young whipper snapper! claim to be a scientist would you! Fetch my cane I'll lay about this young upstart see if I don't!

Look a scientist is just someone who uses scientific method, usually highly qualified, and a philosopher someone who likes to think about the more esoteric questions. I'm sure the kid wasn't suggesting that he was really a scientist or a philosopher although anyone can be a philosopher, but the ogre appears and swats the young impudent scamp for his precociousness :smile: you got to admit it's pretty amusing from my perspective.:-p :biggrin:

Then you must be easily amused.

Zz.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
ZapperZ said:
Then you must be easily amused.

Zz.

English humour it revolves around mockery, mostly of ourselves, but others are fair game too, it's particularly used when someone gets a little high and mighty or a little pompous, I wouldn't take it personally it's just our way :smile: trouble is some people think we're being offensive but we're not we're just messing for fun. No offence.
 
  • #93
Schrödinger's Dog said:
English humour it revolves around mockery, mostly of ourselves, but others are fair game too, it's particularly used when someone gets a little high and mighty or a little pompous, I wouldn't take it personally it's just our way :smile: trouble is some people think we're being offensive but we're not we're just messing for fun. No offence.

But that actually is even more insulting. You make some snide comment and then you tell me I shouldn't be offended because you were just "messing for fun". You can't have it both ways, nor can you control how *I* perceived it.

Just because there have been some folks dumb enough to let you get away with it before doesn't mean you can get away with that all the time.

Zz.
 
  • #94
ZapperZ said:
But that actually is even more insulting. You make some snide comment and then you tell me I shouldn't be offended because you were just "messing for fun". You can't have it both ways, nor can you control how *I* perceived it.

Just because there have been some folks dumb enough to let you get away with it before doesn't mean you can get away with that all the time.

Zz.

I can see you don't take to English humour, I apologise if there was any offence, I won't make the same mistake in future. Sincerely I apologise. It's hard to interpret who will take our sense of humour, I'm sorry you don't find light hearted mockery appropriate in dialogue, I'll be sure to remember that. :frown: oops. :/

Do you really think though it's done to people who are dumb, why bother, they won't get the joke anyway?

And besides who the hell is dumb on this website, :biggrin: I've yet to meet anyone.

Again I'm sorry, I guess it's not well received to make fun of someone who is being a little pompous, sorry my mistake. And I really didn't mean to cause offence although I obviously did.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
45K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K