Greenland Wildfire: Largest Since 2000 Seen by Satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The largest wildfire recorded in Greenland since 2000 was detected by satellite, occurring in an area of recently melted tundra characterized by scrubification and the presence of lichens and mosses. The smoke's color suggests that burning peat, which has melted from permafrost, is contributing to the fire. This peat fire may have been human-caused and poses challenges for extinguishment due to its tendency to smolder underground. The implications of this wildfire include potential releases of methane and CO2, impacting local climate conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of peat as a carbon sink and its role in climate change.
  • Familiarity with satellite monitoring of environmental changes.
  • Knowledge of tundra ecosystems and their response to climate change.
  • Awareness of fire behavior, particularly in peatlands.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of peat fires on greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Explore satellite technologies used for monitoring wildfires, such as NASA's MODIS.
  • Investigate methods for extinguishing underground peat fires.
  • Learn about advancements in hydrogen extraction technologies from biomass.
USEFUL FOR

Environmental scientists, climate change researchers, wildfire management professionals, and anyone interested in the ecological impacts of wildfires in tundra regions.

BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
11,966
Screen Shot 2019-07-12 at 10.25.08 AM.png


The largest known wildfire ever seen in Greenland (since 2000) was found by satellite.
The area (recently melted tundra) had undergone scrubification (shrubs were growing) in addition to lichels, mosses, of the tundra.
Apparently, the color of the smoke indicates peat (melted out from the permafrost) is burning.
It may have been human started.

Peat it seems is a carbon sink (I guess during the continuous process of its formation), but not when its burning.
Perhaps the flames will consume the heat trapping methane molecules to form the less bad CO2 that is expected to be released from melting permafrost, but the heat might locally speed melting. Now there's a benefit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Not yet showing on Google Earth. Lat 67.86° Long -51.492°
 
Apparently the fire either got put out and restarted, or being a peat fire never really got put out.
Small NASA article here.

Peat fires can smolder underground for a while and be difficult to put out.
My parents used to live in Northern Michigan (the UP; Upper Pennisula). Some camper once started a fire on an island (maybe 100 x 200 feet in size), largely made of peat, on the lake they lived on. It took a long time for it to get put out, even though it was only about 10-15 feet above the lake's water line (and therefore the water level in the soil) and surrounded by water.
 
How actually difficult is it to strip the Hydrogen out of bio-matter ? leaving Carbon behind.

Guess, it's a bit too late to put a megaproject windfarm all around the coast of Greenland (highest consistent windspeed in the world, but that's probably a direct result of being covered in ice)
 
hmmm27 said:
How actually difficult is it to strip the Hydrogen out of bio-matter ? leaving Carbon behind
Naturally - millions of years. And then you have coal.
 
There are some fairly cutting edge technological solutions for stripping hydrogen out of liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons. (e.g. platinum and steel membrane technologies) that were once contemplated as being the basis for widespread fuel cell economies. Although the latter may not come to pass anytime soon, the technologies are interesting and are currently in use in defense applications, particularly U.S. military submarines.

I know not exactly what you were getting at, but it is at least in the same neck of the woods conceptually. Maybe the a modified engineering development might develop for this application.

diogenesNY
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
17K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
28K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
12K