Greenpeace: Should They Interfere in UK's Jobs and Third Runway?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jobs
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Greenpeace's recent actions in the UK, specifically their purchase of land to oppose the expansion of Heathrow Airport. Participants explore the implications of such interference on the economy and the role of environmental advocacy in public policy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether Greenpeace should be allowed to interfere in economic matters, suggesting that the government has the authority to reclaim land if it serves the majority's interest.
  • Others express skepticism about Greenpeace's effectiveness, referencing past controversies like the Brent Spar incident and suggesting that their arguments may not be credible.
  • There is a mention of the changing narrative around environmental issues, with some participants noting a shift from concerns about acid rain to climate change as a central argument against nuclear power.
  • A side conversation emerges regarding a non-related link mentioned by a participant, indicating a lighter tone amidst the serious discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the legitimacy and effectiveness of Greenpeace's actions, with some supporting their right to intervene and others questioning their motives and credibility. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific legal frameworks regarding land use and compulsory purchase, but these points are not fully explored or agreed upon. The discussion also touches on historical perceptions of Greenpeace's actions, which may influence current opinions.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
In the news in the UK, Greenpeace has purchased a plot of land the size of a football field, in the hope of stopping the expansion of Heathrow, Greenpeace is using the climate change argument to rally support for it's actions.
Should Greenpeace be allowed to interfere in such matters as the future economy of a country?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5505435.ece
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wolram said:
In the news in the UK, Greenpeace has purchased a plot of land the size of a football field, in the hope of stopping the expansion of Heathrow, Greenpeace is using the climate change argument to rally support for it's actions.
Should Greenpeace be allowed to interfere in such matters as the future economy of a country?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5505435.ece

I have learned that the government can force the land back from GP/other individuals/orgs if it serves the interest of the majority. So interference causes some media fuss and delays until project goes ahead. Not the same thing as building highways when they find Siberian Flying Squirrel poop somewhere on the way. The highway has to be moved if any of that poop is found.

Ps. Wolram, why doesn't the link "spice up my love life the organic way" work?
 
It's not going to do them any good - that's what compulsory purchase is for.

I lost my last bits of belief in Greenpeace over Brent Spar (lets invent some radiation - that scares the public)
They used to think:
Acid rain is bad, nuclear powerstations are bad - therefore nuclear powerstations cause acid rain.
That has been replaced with:
Climate change is bad, nuclear powerstations are bad - therefore nuclear powerstations cause climate change
 
misgfool said:
Ps. Wolram, why doesn't the link "spice up my love life the organic way" work?

The Internet police has diversities?
 
"spice up my love life the organic way"
In Wolram's case - I think it means Sheep!
 

Similar threads

News Should the US intervene in world problems?
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
News Ahmadinejad's speech at Durban II
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
Civilization of millions of rings.
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K