Green's function and density of states

Karthiksrao
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

In his book chapter " Green’s Function Methods for Phonon Transport Through Nano-Contacts", Mingo arrives at the Green's function for the end atom of a one dimensional lattice chain (each atom modeled as a mass connected to neighbouring atoms through springs). He gives the green function as

## G = \frac{2}{\omega^2 + \sqrt{\omega^4 + 4 k \omega^2}} ##

From this the intention is to find the spectral density of states. He directly gives it as

## \rho = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \frac{\sqrt{\omega^4 + 4 k \omega^2}}{2 k \omega^2} ##.

I have not been able to show this.

Earlier in the chapter he uses the standard representation for the spectral density of states as
## G - G^* = 2 \pi \rho ##.

Using this I attempted the following way. Let ## \omega^2 = z ## (he had used such a representation earlier, hence I tried this), which gives:

## G(z) = \frac{2}{z + \sqrt{z^2 + 4 k z}} ##

which can also be written as:

## G(z) = \frac{ z - \sqrt{z^2 + 4 k z}}{- 2 k z} ##

Because of the ## \sqrt{z}## factor there is a branch cut along negative real axis. That's probably the only reason why ## G - G^*## would have a non-negative value - since there would be a non-zero difference in the values across the branch cut.

So what we need is :
## \lim_{\delta \rightarrow 0} G(z+ i \delta) - G(z - i \delta) ##

This gives:

## \rho = \lim_{\delta \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{ \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k}{z+ i \delta}} - 1}{ 2 k } - \frac{ \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k }{z - i \delta}} - 1}{ 2 k } \right) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \left( \frac{ \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k }{z+ i \delta}} - \sqrt{1 + \frac{4 k }{z - i \delta}}}{ 2 k } \right) ##

If you take the limit, this just goes to zero.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would have to take a closer look, but I think you have to write the square root as ##f(z)^{1/2}## and you have to continue it around the branch cut the square root whence it will pick up a factor -1. Summa summarum you will end up with the sum of the two square roots and not it's difference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K