Green's function for Helmholtz Equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Arfken & Weber 9.7.2 - Show that

[itex]\frac{exp(ik|r_{1}-r_{2}|)}{4\pi |r_{1}-r_{2}|}[/itex]

satisfies the two appropriate criteria and therefore is a Green's function for the Helmholtz Equation.


Homework Equations


The Helmholtz operator is given by

[itex]\nabla ^{2}A+k^{2}A[/itex]

Symmetricity of Green's functions.


The Attempt at a Solution


Right off the bat I am not sure what is mean't by "the two appropriate criteria" phrase. What exactly are the two appropriate criteria that they ask for in Arfken & Weber problem 9.7.2? Where can I find this criteria so that I know how to answer this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
matumich26 said:

Homework Statement


Arfken & Weber 9.7.2 - Show that

[itex]\frac{exp(ik|r_{1}-r_{2}|)}{4\pi |r_{1}-r_{2}|}[/itex]

satisfies the two appropriate criteria and therefore is a Green's function for the Helmholtz Equation.


Homework Equations


The Helmholtz operator is given by

[itex]\nabla ^{2}A+k^{2}A[/itex]

Symmetricity of Green's functions.


The Attempt at a Solution


Right off the bat I am not sure what is mean't by "the two appropriate criteria" phrase. What exactly are the two appropriate criteria that they ask for in Arfken & Weber problem 9.7.2? Where can I find this criteria so that I know how to answer this question?

I answered my own question. I read the material 6 hours ago, looked at the assignment and did it but kept coming up with the solution that [itex](\nabla ^{2}+k^2)G=0[/itex], but I kept claiming that was incorrect. Well, looking back for the 100th time I realized this has to be true based on page 598 of Arfken & Weber, not only because it says so but also because the Helmholtz equation indicates a Green's function corresponding to an outgoing wave, which means that G(r1,r2) must satisfy a homogenous differential equation. Wow, that was a lot but I think it makes sense.
 
afkern and weber problem 9.7.3

Hey I am still struggling with the solution of the problem and trying to figure out your explanation. Can you explain it more elaborately.
 
The solutions are given by hankel functions of first kind and second kind.A time dependence of exp(-iwt) is assumed.In physical cases only outgoing wave is present so only one is chosen and not the other.