Greens theorem and parametrization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the application of parameterization in Green's Theorem, particularly in vector line integrals over a plane. It establishes that while parameterization is often necessary for line integrals, it is generally not required for double integrals of the region bounded by the line. The primary purpose of parameterization is to simplify the functions involved in the integral. Additionally, it notes that re-parameterization may be requested depending on the specific problem context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's Theorem
  • Familiarity with vector line integrals
  • Knowledge of double integrals
  • Basic concepts of parameterization in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Green's Theorem in various contexts
  • Learn about parameterization techniques for vector fields
  • Explore Stokes' Theorem and its relation to parameterization in R³
  • Practice solving problems involving line and double integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on vector calculus, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Green's Theorem and its applications.

Syrena
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello. I just wonder if anybody know if there are any rules, when to use parametrization to greens theorem in a vector line integral over a plane. Becouse, it seems sometimes, you have to parametrizice, and other places you dont. I get confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's completely up to you. Of course sometimes you might be asked to re-parametrize or not depending on the problem, but in general it doesn't make a difference. The whole point of parameterizing is to re-write functions in a different way, with the goal of making your parametrization simpler than the problem you began with. So even though one way might be easier than the other, it's totally up to you when to parametrize.
 
Usually you always parameterize the line integral in greens, and don't parameterize the double integral for the region bounded by the line, parameterization for those only comes in handy for not non flat surfaces ie. for the more general Stokes theorem for R3 and up.
 

Similar threads

MHB Can we find the interior of the given curve using Green's theorem?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Undergrad Double integral and Green's theorem
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad Green's theorem and Line Integrals
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Calculate this Integral around the Circular Path using Green's Theorem
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Graduate Understanding Greene's, Stoke's, and the Divergence theorems
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Undergrad Why prove Taylor's theorem with p(x)=q(x)−((b−a)^n/(b−x)^n)q(a)?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Undergrad Establishing Limits for x in Green's Theorem Practice Questions
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Applying Green's Theorem: Solving Parametrized Homework Problems
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad What do Stokes' and Green's theorems represent?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate A question about path orientation in Green's Theorem
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K