• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Griffiths E&M: Do bound charges physically exist?

  • Thread starter jin8
  • Start date
  • #1
24
0
Hello,
Well, actually it's not a homework problem, I just got really confused about bound charges.
Originally, I thought it was just a special technique to do the integral, but somehow Griffiths suggest that bound charges are phsically exist.(chap. 4.2.2) Well, I can accept his argument, but later when we do the boundary condition problem, we have the equation
Integral D dv = Q (free)
So why it's Q free, not Q free plus the surface bound charge ? I know the math why the equation is true, but if surface bound charge physically exist, I don't think the equation make any sense...

Any help is appreciated..
Thanks
-Jin
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
674
2
The bound charges do exist. You see them in:

[tex]\epsilon_0 \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \rho = \rho_{free} + \rho_{bound}[/tex]

Don't forget:

[tex]\vec{D} = \epsilon_0 \vec{E} + \vec{P}[/tex]

So the bound charges are absorbed in the polarization vector.
 
  • #3
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
250
Hi Jin! :smile:

I don't have a copy of Griffiths, but if D in this is the electric displacement field , then by definition only the free charge is involved.

(For P, only the bound charge is involved, and for E the total charge is involved)
 

Related Threads on Griffiths E&M: Do bound charges physically exist?

Replies
4
Views
611
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Top