Bound surface charge on a linear dielectric half-cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving bound surface charge on a linear dielectric half-cylinder, focusing on the application of Gauss's law and the implications of a small electric susceptibility (χe) in the context of electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of Gauss's law to find the electric displacement field (D) and question the symmetry of the problem that would allow for its application. There is also discussion on the relevance of the small susceptibility (χe) and its implications for approximating the electric field and polarization (P).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions necessary for applying Gauss's law and the implications of the small susceptibility. Some guidance has been offered regarding the symmetry of the problem and the first-order approximations that can be made.

Contextual Notes

There is a concern regarding the applicability of Gauss's law due to the lack of symmetry in the entire problem, as well as uncertainty about how to approach the problem given the small value of χe.

Daniel Sellers
Messages
117
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Problem statement in attached photo. This is an ungraded assigned problem which I am using to study for an exam, so I don't need the whole solution just help with a couple of points I am confused about.

One: Part d) is really important to how I will answer part b). If we can use Gauss's law to find D then part b) should be very easy. If we can't then I suppose I will have to use boundary values to solve for P somehow in order to find the bound charges.

I don't see any reason why we shouldn't be able to, but one (very flawed) online solution said we could not, and the fact that we are asked the question makes me nervous about proceeding this way, so I wanted to ask some of the critical experts that frequent this forum.

Two: Why is the fact Xe << 1 relevant? This also seems to point me towards using boundary value equations to solve the problem, but I'm simply not familiar enough with this material yet to confidently set up the problem.

Homework Equations



P = ε0χeE

Gauss's law for electric displacement?

D = ε0E + P = εE

The Attempt at a Solution



I am fairly confident that I have solved part a) correctly and that I can solve the rest if the above points are clarified
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-11-28 at 10.09.37 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-11-28 at 10.09.37 PM.png
    45.3 KB · Views: 745
Physics news on Phys.org
Daniel Sellers said:

Homework Statement


One: Part d) is really important to how I will answer part b). If we can use Gauss's law to find D then part b) should be very easy. If we can't then I suppose I will have to use boundary values to solve for P somehow in order to find the bound charges.

I don't see any reason why we shouldn't be able to...

In order to use Gauss' law, there needs to be enough symmetry so that there will exist a particular shape of the Gaussian surface that will allow you to simplify ##\oint \mathbf{D \cdot da}##. So, think about whether there is sufficient symmetry in this problem.

Two: Why is the fact Xe << 1 relevant?
This will allow you to use approximations in which you only need to be accurate to first order in ##\chi_e##. For example, it should be easy to find an expression for the polarization ##\mathbf{P}## that is accurate to first order in ##\chi_e## if you know ##\mathbf{E}## due to the line charge.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daniel Sellers
When considering the free charge only, we have cylindrical symmetry, but that symmetry does not apply to the entire problem. So for now I will abandon using Gauss's law.

As for χe, assuming that it is very small let's us say that ε ≈ ε0. This would suggest that the electric field in the dielectric is approximately the field we would see from the charged wire alone.

Then P ≈ χeλ/(2πr) in the radial direction.

Is this close to what you meant?
 
Daniel Sellers said:
When considering the free charge only, we have cylindrical symmetry, but that symmetry does not apply to the entire problem. So for now I will abandon using Gauss's law.
Right.

As for χe, assuming that it is very small let's us say that ε ≈ ε0. This would suggest that the electric field in the dielectric is approximately the field we would see from the charged wire alone.

Then P ≈ χeλ/(2πr) in the radial direction.

Is this close to what you meant?
Yes, exactly what I meant. :oldsmile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daniel Sellers
Terrific! Back to practicing electrostatics problems then.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K