Griffiths quantum harmonic oscillator derivation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
Syrus
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am unsure as to a step in Griffiths's derivation of the quantum harmonic oscillator. In particular, I am wondering how he arrived at the equations at the top of the second attached photo, from the last equation (at the bottom) of the first photo (which is the recursion relation approximated for large j).

Any help?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMAG0739.jpg
    IMAG0739.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 550
  • IMAG0741.jpg
    IMAG0741.jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 569
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute the approx. solution into the approx. equation. Is it satisfied?
 
Is there a way to derive the solutions besides via a fortiori means?
 
The could be some clever way, but since the exact solution is known, the approx. solution could equally have been obtained from it.

EDIT: it actually seems very simple: since for every "next" term we divide the previous by j/2, one should expect (j/2)! in the denominator, and c/(j/2)! should be fairly obvious as a possible solution.
 
Last edited: