Ground State Energy of quantum oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The ground state energy of the Quantum Simple Harmonic Oscillator (QSHO) is definitively expressed as \( \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega \), which aligns with the principles of quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle. The discussion clarifies that the energy-time uncertainty relation is not the correct starting point for deriving this result; instead, one should utilize the position-momentum uncertainty relation \( \Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} \). By applying the Hamiltonian for the QSHO and the definition of variance, one can derive the expected energy value and confirm that \( \langle E \rangle \geq \frac{1}{2}\hbar\omega \) is the correct interpretation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of the Quantum Simple Harmonic Oscillator (QSHO)
  • Familiarity with the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the position-momentum uncertainty relation
  • Learn about the Hamiltonian for the Quantum Simple Harmonic Oscillator
  • Explore the concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of the energy-time uncertainty relation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the principles governing quantum oscillators.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
My textbook says the ground state energy of the QSHO is given by 1/2*h_bar*w and that this is the minimum energy consistent with the uncertainty principle. However I am having trouble deriving this myself... ΔEΔt ≥ h_bar / 2.. so then ΔE/Δfrequency ≥ h_bar / 2...

ΔE*2*pi / w ≥ h_bar / 2
ΔE ≥ h_bar*w / 4*pi

what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You aren't doing anything wrong per say, at least not as far as I can tell. ##\Delta t## is the characteristic time scale of the system and certainly since we have a characteristic frequency scale ##\omega##, the characteristic time scale should be given by ##\Delta t = \frac{2\pi}{\omega}##.

I'm not entirely sure why you chose to start with the energy-time uncertainty relation; if you take a look at its derivation, particularly the assumptions about the evolution of expectation values of operators through a characteristic time period of the system, you would see that it's much more subtle a relation than the usual position-momentum uncertainty relation, but even that withstanding, the text is referring to ##\langle E \rangle ##, not ##\Delta E##, when it talks about the minimum energy consistent with the uncertainty principle. In other words ##\langle E \rangle \geq \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega## is the desired result.

So start instead with ##\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}##. Write down the expectation value for the total energy using the Hamiltonian for the QSHO and use the definition of variance and the position-momentum uncertainty relation to get an inequality for the energy expectation value involving only ##\Delta p##. Then minimize the result.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 113 ·
4
Replies
113
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K