Group I/II Metal oxides always basic in aqueous solution -- why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adf89812
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal
AI Thread Summary
Group I and II metal oxides in aqueous solutions are considered basic due to their lower electronegativity compared to non-metals. This property allows them to act as proton acceptors, facilitating the release of hydroxide ions in water. The discussion highlights that when these metal oxides dissolve, they donate electrons to hydrogen, leading to the formation of hydroxide ions as hydrogen detaches from water molecules. In contrast, non-metal oxides, being more electronegative, tend to form larger acid molecules without releasing protons as readily, resulting in acidic behavior. The conversation emphasizes that electronegativity is an intrinsic property of elements and does not diminish upon bonding, suggesting a need to explore the net electronegativity effect in compounds to fully understand these behaviors.
adf89812
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Make argument rigorous

Transform my handy-wavy explanation of why group I/II metals oxides in aqueous solution are basic into a rigorous argument​


I heard an explanation about something being a better proton acceptor or lone pair donor but that doesn't make sense. I couldn't explain in in terms of acid-base theory.

The hand-waving way I saw it was that group I/II metal oxides are less electronegative than non-metals, so in water, they'll donate their electron to the hydrogen, the hydrogen will break away from the oxygen because hydrogen hates oxygen hogging its electrons, and because hydrogen electronegative enough.

With non-metals, my hand-waving is that metal oxides are more electronegative, when they bond with water, they'll just form one bigger molecule because they suck on other's electrons without letting go and form one big acid molecule where the least electronegative thing in there is a hydrogen, which falls of into a proton, and it may or may not be polyprotic.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
adf89812 said:
group I/II metal oxides are less electronegative than non-metals

Electronegativity is a property of an element, not of a compound.
 
Borek said:
Electronegativity is a property of an element, not of a compound.
electronegative doesn't disappear when you form a chemical bond. Oxygen doesn't become less electronegative AFAIK when it bonds.
 
adf89812 said:
electronegative doesn't disappear when you form a chemical bond. Oxygen doesn't become less electronegative AFAIK when it bonds.
Maybe there's something about net electronegativity effect in molecules?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top