Groups do not necessarily have to have only one operation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of groups in abstract algebra, specifically addressing whether groups must have only one operation or if multiple operations can exist on a set while still being identified with a single operation. The scope includes theoretical considerations and clarifications regarding group definitions and operations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that groups can have more than one operation defined on a set, but typically only one operation is used to identify the group.
  • It is suggested that when referring to a group, it is important to specify which operation is being used, as the term "group" can be ambiguous without this context.
  • One participant questions whether it is valid to assume multiplication as an operation when discussing the group of rational numbers under addition, particularly in the context of proving closure.
  • Another participant agrees that while it is valid to expand definitions, one should not confuse the operations being applied to group elements.
  • Clarifications are made that in the context of rational numbers, operations discussed involve integers rather than the rational numbers themselves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a single operation for groups, with some asserting that only one operation is typically defined, while others argue for the possibility of multiple operations existing simultaneously. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of using multiple operations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of specifying operations when discussing groups, indicating that assumptions about operations can lead to confusion. There is also a mention of the need for clarity in definitions when proving properties like closure.

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
To be sure of things, groups do not necessarily have to have only one operation; they may have more, but there is one and only one operation they are identified with. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There may be two operations o and * defined on a set G, such that (G, o) and (G, *) are both groups.
When we say "let G be a group" we're sloppy, you should say what the operation is.
 


Thus, if I were asked whether the set of all rational numbers Q with addition was a group, would it be valid to assume multiplication as an operation and state that a/b + c/d = (ad + cb)/(bd) ε Q (for a, b, c, d ε Z) in the case of proving that addition is closed with respect to Q.
 


Gear300 said:
Thus, if I were asked whether the set of all rational numbers Q with addition was a group, would it be valid to assume multiplication as an operation and state that a/b + c/d = (ad + cb)/(bd) ε Q (for a, b, c, d ε Z) in the case of proving that addition is closed with respect to Q.

Yes, that's valid, but you're not multiplying group elements (which would be bad). You're just expanding the definition of rational addition.
 


I see. Thanks for the replies.
 


Well, in general there is only one operation that is defined in a group. That is there is only one operation which is applied berween the elements of a group.

In your example, we could say let (Q,@) be a group, where Q is the set of rational numbers, and then we would say that @ is defined in this way:

[tex]\frac{a}{b} @ \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a*d+c*b}{b*d}[/tex]

where + is the natural addition symbol and * multiplication.

But, like it was said above, here you are not multiplying the elements of Q, which we have assumed are of the form

[tex]Q={ \frac{a}{b}: a,b \in Z }[/tex]
 


But in any case, in
[tex]\frac{a}{b}+ \frac{c}{d}= \frac{ad+ bc}{cd}[/tex]
You are NOT multiplying rational number you are multiplying integers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K