Guide to Writing a Physics Paper: Templates, Structure and Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter chis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of writing a physics paper, including inquiries about structure, templates, and the feasibility of publication for individuals without formal academic backgrounds. Participants explore the challenges faced by laypersons in getting published in peer-reviewed journals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on the general structure of a physics paper and requests templates or examples.
  • Another participant suggests a resource (arXiv) for finding papers that could serve as templates.
  • Concerns are raised about the likelihood of a layman getting published, with one participant stating that the chances are very low, even for established researchers.
  • A participant expresses a desire to write about a "theory of everything," specifically focusing on gravity, time, and mass, while acknowledging their lack of formal education.
  • Another participant questions how one can assess the worthiness of their ideas without a comprehensive understanding of the subject area, suggesting that ignorance of existing knowledge could lead to wasted efforts.
  • One participant reflects on the challenges of pursuing such ambitions, acknowledging the commonality of these aspirations among non-experts.
  • A later reply expresses agreement with the skepticism regarding the feasibility of such projects but emphasizes the enjoyment of the learning process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of skepticism regarding the publication prospects for laypersons and encouragement to pursue personal interests in physics. There is no consensus on the feasibility of publishing a paper without formal training, and differing views on the value of pursuing such ambitions are evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding existing knowledge in the field and the potential pitfalls of pursuing ideas without a solid foundation in physics. There are references to external resources that may help inform the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in writing physics papers, particularly those without formal academic backgrounds, as well as those curious about the publication process in scientific journals.

chis
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I would like to write a physics paper but was at a loss as to the general structure of one.
Can you guys point me in the direction of some templates, or papers that would act as good templates?
Also what are the chances of a layman getting published or even entertained by peer reviewed journals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The chances of a layman getting published are marginally above if not zero. Its hard enough to to get any paper published even with a great reputation, lots of previous papers and years of research.

Dont let that stop you though. You want to do it, go for it!

What area are you thinking of writing about?
 
xxChrisxx said:
The chances of a layman getting published are marginally above if not zero. Its hard enough to to get any paper published even with a great reputation, lots of previous papers and years of research.

Dont let that stop you though. You want to do it, go for it!

What area are you thinking of writing about?

I have a theory of everything to give it its popular dramatic title, but more specifically gravity, time and mass. I know my kook rating just shot up, but just because I was unable to go to Uni doesn't mean I can't be right. I understand I am literally barking at the moon, but it is a safe hobby and dream to have. It beats gambling and drug taking hands down.
What do you suggest as a more realistic audience for any paper I may produce?
 
chis said:
I have a theory of everything to give it its popular dramatic title, but more specifically gravity, time and mass. I know my kook rating just shot up, but just because I was unable to go to Uni doesn't mean I can't be right. I understand I am literally barking at the moon, but it is a safe hobby and dream to have. It beats gambling and drug taking hands down.
What do you suggest as a more realistic audience for any paper I may produce?

I have a very obvious question: How are you to know that what you have is worthy of consideration when you do not have the full faculty of the subject area that you think you're working in? The fact that you don't even know about physics journals should already cause you great concern, because it implies that you are ignorant of advances and knowledge in that field of study, much less if what you are doing is already well-known or proven to be false.

While it is fine to "dream", imagination without knowledge is ignorance waiting to happen. You may have wasted a lot of time for nothing.

Before you proceed, you may want to read this:

http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html

It isn't meant to discourage. It is only to show you that you are not the first, nor shall you be the last, to have this kind of "ambition". Unfortunately for many of us here, we have seen all this before, and there's nothing to indicate that this will end any differently.

Zz.
 
Yes you are spot on and I agree it is a popular pipe dream and I am just another pipe wielding nut. I do like the challenge and will carry on learning and enjoying the process.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
17K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K