H2O to HHO: Is Water Power the Greatest Invention Ever?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Water
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around skepticism regarding claims made about a water-fueled welding machine and the concept of "HHO" gas, often referred to as Brown's gas. Participants express doubt about the legitimacy of the technology, questioning the efficiency and scientific basis of the claims. Concerns are raised about the lack of transparency and detailed explanations regarding the process, with many suggesting it resembles long-debunked pseudoscience. The welding machine's reliance on a gasoline engine to power the hydrogen generator further fuels skepticism, as does the vague terminology used to describe the gas produced. Participants highlight that the claims have been around since the 1960s without substantial evidence or peer-reviewed support. The conversation also touches on the potential dangers of DIY hydrogen production methods and the inefficiency of using water to generate fuel, emphasizing that the energy required for electrolysis exceeds the energy gained from combustion. Overall, the thread reflects a critical examination of the scientific validity of the claims and the motivations behind them.
  • #31
Total BS. You need to split the water into HHO first, which is not an easy task, but more importantly, then you burn the HHO, you can't get any new energy out of it, just whatever you put into split it in the first place.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
They add baking soda as a catalyst and use the car battery to run electricity through metal coils submerged in the water container which has a vacuum line connected to it. Would that process work? Where is information that says that using this process would require more energy input in electricity than would be released as mechanical energy when combusting the product?
 
  • #33
W3pcq said:
Where is information that says that using this process would require more energy input in electricity than would be released as mechanical energy when combusting the product?

Try any chemistry textbook.
 
  • #34
Mine doesn't provide this info.
 
  • #36
You probably can. Still doesn't change the fact that you're paying for something that doesn't work.
 
  • #37
It is H2, not HHO. The hydrogen only remains monoatomic for a few milliseconds.

HHO = nonsense.

If you make H2 to burn in your car, you spend about twice as much energy to make it as you get back from it as a fuel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K