Half Life of radioactive needle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay of a radioactive needle containing 222 Rn and its relationship with 226 Ra in secular equilibrium. The original poster seeks to determine the time required for 222 Rn to decay to half of its original activity, referencing the half-life of the isotopes involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of decay equations and the concept of secular equilibrium. There are attempts to derive expressions for the activities of the isotopes involved and questions about previous derivations in class or textbooks.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the mathematical relationships between the activities of the isotopes and considering how to set up the equations for solving the problem. Some guidance is offered regarding the derivation of expressions, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential gaps in prior knowledge regarding derivations related to secular equilibrium, and the participants are navigating through the complexities of the problem without a complete resolution.

completenoob
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A radioactive needle contains 222 Rn (t1/2=3.83 d) in secular equilibrium with 226 Ra(t1/2=1600 a). How long does is it required for 222 Rn to decay to half of its original activity?

Homework Equations


A(t) = -\frac{dN(t)}{dt} = \lambda N(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


Secular equilibrium occurs when the activity of the daughter is approximately equal to the activity of the parent.
Do I just work the above equation for the Daughter Rn?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A_a(t) = \frac{dN_a(t)}{dt} = -\lambda_a N_a(t)
and

A_b(t) = \frac{dN_b(t)}{dt} = \lambda_a N_a(t) - \lambda_b N_b(t)

one must derive an expression for Nb

Has one not done so in class or is there not such a derivation in one's textbook?


Secular equilibrium occurs when dNb/dt = 0, i.e. the activity of b is determined by the decay of a, i.e. Nb is proportional to Na.

N_b = \frac{\lambda_a}{\lambda_b} N_a

Reference - http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/reprint/20/2/162.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_equilibrium
 
Ok. So
<br /> N_a(t)=N_a(0) e^{-\lambda t} <br />

Then set
<br /> N_b \longrightarrow \frac{1}{2}N_b <br />

Plug that into
<br /> N_b = \frac{\lambda_a}{\lambda_b} N_a<br />
And solve for t. Right?
 
Correction, I should take the derivative of
N_b(t) = \frac{\lambda_a}{lambda_b} N_a(0) e^{-\lambda_a t}
Put in \frac{A(t)}{2} equal to that stuff
Then solve for t correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K