Half-wave dipole antenna radiation pattern

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the radiation pattern of half-wave dipole antennas, comparing them with one-wave and three-half-wave dipole antennas. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical considerations, and design choices related to antenna performance and configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the provided images of radiation patterns for a half-wave dipole antenna are sufficient for horizontal and vertical planes.
  • Another participant points out that the radiation patterns shared are for a vertical dipole and provides alternative patterns generated using the Eznec Demo program, noting the complexity increases with antenna length.
  • There is a discussion about the feeding points of antennas, highlighting that a two half-wave antenna must be fed at a specific point due to impedance considerations.
  • One participant suggests that a three half-wave dipole might be preferable due to higher gain, prompting a response about the practicality of such a design.
  • Another participant argues that the gain increase from a three half-wave dipole may not justify its length, suggesting that a modest height increase could yield similar signal improvements.
  • The advantages of a three half-wave dipole are discussed, particularly in terms of directional radiation patterns, which may provide better coverage in certain directions.
  • Practical limitations are noted regarding the physical space required for larger antennas, especially in suburban settings.
  • At higher frequencies, a Yagi antenna is mentioned as a potentially better choice for achieving good gain with the ability to rotate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and effectiveness of three half-wave dipoles compared to half-wave dipoles, with no consensus reached on which design is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific frequencies and physical dimensions of antennas, indicating that practical considerations such as space and height significantly influence antenna design choices.

zak8000
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i just have a few questions about the radiation pattern of a half wave dipole antenna.

firstly i know the for the half wave dipole we can dervie and expression for the electric field in the zenith angle and the magnetic field in the azimutal angle by using the far field approximation. so if i was asked to draw the radiaton pattern in the horizontal and vertical plane would the following images suffice i have provided a link: http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/Radio/dipole-radiation-pattern-low.gif

also if i was to compare a one wave dipole to a half wave dipoles radiation pattern would i expect a similair shape but double the magnitude?

finally if i had a choice to design between a half wave dipole and a 3/2 wave dipole antenna, which would result in a better antenna?. Is a half wave dipole a more practical antenna than the 3/2 wave dipole or vice versa or they are both practical


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your radiation patterns are for a vertical dipole.

I used the free program Eznec Demo to produce the following radiation patterns for horizontal antennas. Anyone interested in antennas should probably get this program.

These are azimuth diagrams, so they are like looking down from above.
In each case, the antenna is on the vertical line down the center of the circle.
[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4222062/dipole%201%20and%202%20half%20waves.PNG
[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4222062/dipole%203%20half%20waves.PNG

Notice that the pattern becomes more complex as the antenna gets longer in terms of wavelength and also the gain increases slightly.

The 2 half wave antenna has to be fed at the point 25% of the total length from one end. The center point is high impedance and so the antenna can't easily be driven there..
The other antennas are fed in the center.

These are free space diagrams and proximity to ground has a profound effect on the pattern of these antennas.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the clear demonstration. so i was wondering if i had a choice between a half wave dipole and a 3 half wave dipole to design. then i should design a 3 half wave dipole antenna because it will have a higher gain ?
 
A 1 dB gain would not be worth putting up an antenna that was 3 times as long, if that was the only reason you were doing it.
You could get that much increase in signal by raising the antenna a few feet higher.

The advantage, if you had room for the bigger antenna, would be that the extra gain applied in more directions. A half wave dipole has a fairly broad radiation pattern but it is mostly at right angles to the dipole.
Three half waves have radiation as shown in the diagram above. Some lobes are at 45 degrees to the dipole and this may give better coverage in those directions.

Such antennas are mostly the sort of thing you can achieve if you own a 100 acre farm, or work for someone who does, though.
A half wave dipole on 3.5 MHz (a popular Radio Amateur band) is 132 ft long. Even this barely fits into a large suburban block. Three half waves would be 396 ft long which is out of the question for most of us.
At higher frequencies, where such an antenna might be reasonable, the Yagi antenna is a better choice. It gives good gain and it can be rotated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K