Hamilton function of a free particle/Landau's book

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Hamilton function and equations for a free particle as presented in Landau's classical mechanics book. The user initially struggles with the Cartesian coordinates, calculating the Lagrangian as L = (m/2)(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2) - U(x,y,z) and deriving the Hamilton function. The correct Hamilton function is identified as H = (1/2m)(p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2) + U(x,y,z), emphasizing that H must depend solely on p, q, and t, not on \dot{q}. The user expresses concern about the clarity of Landau's explanations compared to Goldstein's work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics concepts
  • Proficiency in calculus and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics from Lagrangian mechanics
  • Learn about the significance of generalized coordinates in Hamiltonian systems
  • Explore alternative classical mechanics texts, such as Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics"
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum and velocity in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


The problem is taken out of Landau's book on classical mechanics. I must find the Hamilton function and the corresponding Hamilton equations for a free particle in Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates.

Homework Equations


Hamilton function: [itex]H(p,q,t)= \sum p_i \dot q _i -L[/itex] where L is the Lagrangian.
Hamilton equations: [itex]\dot q_i = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}[/itex] and [itex]\dot p_i =-\frac{\partial H}{\partial q _i}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm stuck on Cartesian coordinates so far. [itex]L=\frac{m}{2}(\dot x ^2 + \dot y^2 +\dot z^2)-U(x,y,z)[/itex].
[itex]p_i=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q _i}=m \dot q_i \Rightarrow \dot p_i=m \ddot q_i[/itex].
[itex]H=m \dot x ^2 +m \dot y^2 +m \dot z ^2 - \frac{m}{2} (\dot x^2 + \dot y^2 +\dot z^2)+U(x,y,z)=\frac{m}{2}(\dot x ^2 +\dot y^2 +\dot z^2)+U(x,y,z)[/itex]. I notice that the Hamilton function is the Hamiltonian and that in this case it's worth the total energy of the system (the free particle).
However the solution given in the book is [itex]H=\frac{1}{2m} (p _x ^2+ p_y^2 +p_z ^2)+U(x,y,z)[/itex]. Why is it expressed under this form? I took Landau's expressions and definitions and land on a different answer... why?!

Edit: Hmm I guess it's because H should depend only on p, q and t. Never on [itex]\dot q[/itex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lagrangian is a function of [itex]q[/itex], [itex]\dot{q}[/itex], and [itex]t[/itex]
Hamiltonian is a function of [itex]q[/itex], [itex]p[/itex], and [itex]t[/itex]

You might think that this is just semantics since [itex]\dot{q}[/itex] and [itex]p[/itex] are proportional to each other, but it is very important distinction.

Not sure Landau is the best book to learn these stuff from. It loves elegant solutions and hates verbose explanation.
 
Ok thanks a lot for the explanation.
By the way, about the book, do you have any other suggestion? I currently own Goldstein's 1st edition on classical mechanics. I find very few worked examples and lots of theory. So I try to complete with Landau's book.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K