Hamilton Operator for particle on a circle -- Matrix representation....

Click For Summary
The Hamiltonian for a particle on a circle is expressed in polar coordinates as \(\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2mR^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2}\). A suitable basis for representing this operator in matrix form is the set of eigenfunctions, which can be expressed as exponential functions or as sums of sines and cosines. The matrix elements of an operator \(\hat{S}\) with respect to this basis are defined by the integral \(S_{mn}=\int_{0}^{2\pi} \phi_m(\phi) \hat{S} \phi_n(\phi) d\phi\). It is important to note that the resulting matrix will be infinite dimensional due to the infinite number of eigenfunctions. This approach emphasizes the need for a diagonal basis to simplify calculations.
JonnyMaddox
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Hey JO.

The Hamiltonian is:
H= \frac{p_{x}^{2}+p_{y}^{2}}{2m}

In quantum Mechanics:
\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}})

In polar coordinates:
\hat{H}=-\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}( \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \phi^{2}})

Now I want to write this operator in matrix form. What is an appropriate basis? I thought a good would be {sin(x),sin(2x),sin(3x),...,sin(nx)} Now how do I do that in a two dimensional space? What is the basis for that? Something like {sin(x),sin(y),...sin(nx),sin(ny)} ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Hamiltonians are wrong. The first two Hamiltonians are for a free particle in two dimensions, not for a particle on a circle. Anyway, its not reasonable to do this in Cartesian coordinates.
Going to polar coordinates, and noticing that there is only one degree of freedom(the azimuthal angle), the Hamiltonian is ## \hat H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2mR^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \phi^2} ##.

Now consider the set of basis vectors ##\{|\psi_n\rangle\} ##. The matrix elements of an operator ## \hat S ## w.r.t. this set of basis vectors is defined as ## S_{mn}=\langle \psi_m|\hat S|\psi_n\rangle ##. The basis vectors don't have to be related to the operator but a convenient basis for this job is a basis in which the matrix ##S_{mn}## is diagonal. So the set of eigenvectors of the operator ## \hat S ##(##\hat S|\psi_m\rangle=\lambda_m|\psi_m\rangle##) is a convenient basis.

When the operator is a differential operator and the vectors are functions, the matrix elements can be calculated using an integral ## S_{mn}=\int_{\zeta_1}^{\zeta_2} \phi_m(\zeta) \hat S \phi_n(\zeta) d\zeta ##. For the above Hamiltonian, ##\zeta## is the azimuthal angle ##\phi## and the range of integration is 0 to 2π and the eigenfunctions are exponential functions with imaginary exponents which can also be written as the sum of sines and cosines if you want. Note that there are an infinite number of eigenfunctions and so the matrix ## H_{mn} ## will be infinite dimensional.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
972
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K