Hamiltonian after transformation to interaction picture

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
lutherblissett
Dear all,

I am encoutering some difficulties while calculating the Hamiltonian after the transformation to the interaction picture. I am following the tutorial by Sasura and Buzek:
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112041

Previous:
I already know that the Hamiltonian for the j-th ion is given by two terms:

[tex]\hat{H} = \hat{H}_{0j} + \hat{V}_j[/tex]

where the two terms are the free Hamiltonian and the interaction hamiltonian
[tex]\hat{H}_{0j} = \dfrac{1}{2} \hbar \omega_0 \sigma_{zj} + \nu \hat{a}^\dagger \hat{a}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{V}_j = -q_e\left [ \left (\mathbf{r}_{eg}\right )_j \hat{\sigma}_{+j} + \left (\mathbf{r}_{eg}\right )^*_j \hat{\sigma}_{-j} \right ] \cdot \dfrac{E_0 \varepsilon }{2} \left \{ e^{ -i \left [ \omega_L t - \eta_j \left ( \hat{a}^\dagger + \hat{a} \right ) + \phi_j \right ] } + \text{ h.c.} \right \}[/tex]

I don't understand how one can obtain the transformed Hamiltonian [itex]\hat{\mathcal{H}} = \hat{U}^\dagger_0 \hat{V} \hat{U}_0[/itex] where [itex]\hat{U}_0 = exp \left \{ - \dfrac{i}{\hbar} \hat{H}_0 t \right \}[/itex].

Could someone explain me the steps to obtain it, please? I will be very grateful :D

thank you in advance

LB
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I recommend taking as much advantage of commutativity as possible. The unperturbed operator is the sum of two operator which commute. This allows ##U_0## to be factored into two commuting unitary operators. One then commutes the various terms such that the spin factors and mode operators are each transformed by their respective unitary transforms. Also recall that ##U^\dagger f(\hat{o}) U = f(U^\dagger \hat{o} U)## where ##f## is a c-number function and ##\hat{o}## is some unsuspecting operator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lutherblissett and vanhees71
Thank you Paul, I've done it! Your hint on c-number functions has been fundamental.

Thank you.

LB