Hamiltonian matrix eigenvalue calculation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a Hamiltonian matrix for a spin system with two possible states. The matrix is given as H = (^{E1}_{0} ^{0}_{E2}), with associated eigenstates and eigenvalues. Participants are tasked with verifying the eigenstates and exploring their time evolution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions and implications of eigenstates and eigenvalues, with some expressing difficulty in visualizing these concepts. Questions arise about the calculations needed to verify the eigenstates and the nature of their time evolution.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on fundamental concepts and the specific calculations required. Some have provided explanations of eigenstates and eigenvalues, while others are still grappling with the implications of these definitions in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the initial steps to take in the problem, and participants are navigating the complexities of quantum state evolution without a clear consensus on the approach.

neon.neon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spin system with only 2 possible states

H = ([tex]^{E1}_{0}[/tex] [tex]^{0}_{E2}[/tex])

with eigenstates
[tex]\vec{\varphi_{1}}[/tex] = ([tex]^{1}_{0}[/tex]) and [tex]\vec{\varphi_{2}}[/tex] = ([tex]^{0}_{1}[/tex])

and eigenvalues E1 and E2.

Verify this & how do these eigenstates evolve in time?

Homework Equations



I'm even not sure how to start...

Maybe someone could help me out, I'd come up with an attempt if I'd know how. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what eigenstates and eigenvalues are?
 
Of course I read about it, but it's hard to "imagine".

Is there any "low-mathematical" way of an explanation?
 
Think of it this way: a matrix represents some sort of transformation on a vector space. (Rotation would be one example of a transformation.) Now, for most of the vectors in the space, when you transform them, you get a new vector that points in a completely different direction. But for each transformation, there are some special vectors that, when transformed, continue to point in the same direction, although their length may change. Those vectors are the eigenvectors, and the factors by which their lengths change are the eigenvalues.

Now consider what that means in mathematical language. The matrix is, of course, the transformation. To transform a vector, you multiply it by the matrix. So if your matrix is H, and your vector is ψ, the transformed vector will be . In order for that vector to be an eigenvector, as I said above, the transformed vector has to be pointing in the same direction as the original vector. Mathematically, that means that it has to be a multiple of the original vector; that can be written as , where E is some number. So the eigenvectors need to satisfy
[tex]H\psi = E\psi[/tex]
where E is a number.

Does that help?
 
... and eigenstates are?

Does that mean I just have to calculate [tex]H\varphi_{1} = E_{1}\varphi_{1}[/tex] and [tex]H\varphi_{2} = E_{2}\varphi_{2}[/tex] ?

And what about the time evolving part in the question?


But thanks a lot for now, I think I understood the eigenvectors/eigenvalues !
 
neon.neon said:
... and eigenstates are?
Let me start by saying that a state is something that encapsulates all the information you need to know about a physical system. A quantum system has an infinite number of possible states, but they can all be expressed as linear combinations of some number of basis states. For example, if the states are denoted by kets ([itex]\vert\text{something}\rangle[/itex]), you might use numbered kets ([itex]\vert 1\rangle[/itex],[itex]\vert 2\rangle[/itex], etc.) to denote the basis states, and then you could write a general ket as
[tex]\vert\psi\rangle = a_1\vert 1\rangle + a_2\vert 2\rangle + \cdots[/tex]
Or the basis states could be unit directions
[tex]\hat{x},\hat{y},\hat{z}[/tex]
and then a general state would be
[tex]\vec{r} = a_x \hat{x} + a_y \hat{y} + a_z \hat{z}[/tex]
Anyway, regardless of what kind of things your states actually are, you can take the coefficients [itex]a_i[/itex] and put them into a vector,
[tex]\begin{pmatrix}a_1 \\ a_2 \\ \vdots\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
or
[tex]\begin{pmatrix}a_x \\ a_y \\ a_z\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
If that vector is an eigenvector of some matrix, then the state that corresponds to the vector is an eigenstate of the operator that corresponds to the matrix.

In your case, the basis states are actually basis vectors themselves - that is, the vectors
[tex]\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix},\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
actually are the basis states. And the states, instead of being kets or unit directions, are just 2-component vectors. Because of that, in this particular problem, you can consider "eigenvector" and "eigenstate" to be synonymous.
neon.neon said:
Does that mean I just have to calculate [tex]H\varphi_{1} = E_{1}\varphi_{1}[/tex] and [tex]H\varphi_{2} = E_{2}\varphi_{2}[/tex] ?
Yep, that's what you need to show.
neon.neon said:
And what about the time evolving part in the question?
Well, what do you know about how quantum states evolve over time?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K