Hamiltonian of charged particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian for a charged particle of mass m under a central force described by F = k/r² is derived using the potential energy U(r) = -k/r. The Lagrangian is expressed as L = T - U, where T is the kinetic energy. The Hamiltonian is formulated as H(r, θ, p_r, p_θ) = (p_r²/m) + (p_θ²/(mr²)) - (k/r), simplifying to H = (1/2)(p_r²/m) + (1/2)(p_θ²/(mr²)) - (k/r). The discussion emphasizes the correctness of the Hamiltonian formulation and suggests exploring Hamiltonians for charged particles in electromagnetic fields for further complexity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and the principle of least action
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates and their application in physics
  • Basic concepts of central forces and potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hamiltonian mechanics in the context of charged particles in electromagnetic fields
  • Explore the derivation of Lagrangians for systems with non-conservative forces
  • Investigate the relationship between Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations in complex systems
  • Learn about the implications of Hamiltonian dynamics in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of classical mechanics, and anyone interested in advanced dynamics of charged particles and Hamiltonian systems.

Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
A charged particle of mass m is attracted by a central force with magnitude [tex]F = \frac{k}{r^2}[/tex]. Find the Hamiltonian of the particle.

I'm just wondering if I did this correctly because it seemed too easy. First I used the fact that -dU/dr = F = k/r^2, so the potential (with infinite boundary) is given by
[tex]U(r) = \frac{-k}{r}[/tex]

Then using plane polar coordinates the Legrangian will be
[tex]L = T - U = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2) + \frac{k}{r}[/tex]

The general momenta will be given by
[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}} = p_r = m \dot{r}/[tex] and<br /> [tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}= p_\theta = mr^2 \dot{\theta}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Putting the momenta in terms of the dots of the generalized coordinates<br /> [tex]\dot{r} = \frac{p_r}{m}[/tex]<br /> and<br /> [tex]\dot{\theta} = \frac{p_\theta}{mr^2}[/tex]<br /> <br /> So the Hamiltonian will be<br /> [tex]H(q_k, p_k) = \sum_j p_j \dot{q}_j - L(q_k, \dot{q}_k)[/tex]<br /> i.e.<br /> [tex]H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\theta}^2) - \frac{k}{r}[/tex]<br /> and with the momenta equations<br /> [tex]H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{1}{2}m((\frac{p_r}{m})^2 + r^2 (\frac{p_\theta}{mr^2})^2) - \frac{k}{r}[/tex]<br /> <br /> simplified this will give the familiar H = T + U<br /> [tex]H(r, \theta, \dot{r}, \dot{\theta}) = \frac{1}{2} \frac{p_r^2}{m} + \frac{1}{2} \frac{p_\theta^2}{mr^2} - \frac{k}{r}[/tex][/tex][/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
looks ok
if it is too easy, have look at the hamiltonian for charges and fields in the full EM theory, could be a bit more challenging and interresting
 
You got the sign of U wrong.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K